Patient viewing of the ultrasound image prior to abortion
- PMID: 24028750
- DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.07.006
Patient viewing of the ultrasound image prior to abortion
Abstract
Background: Little research has investigated women's interest in and factors associated with viewing their ultrasound image in abortion care.
Study design: Using medical records for all abortion care visits in 2011 (n = 15,575) at an urban abortion provider, we determined the proportion of women who chose to view by sociodemographic and pregnancy-related characteristics. We used bivariate and multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression models to examine associations between individual-level factors and the decision to view.
Results: A total of 42.6% of women chose to view. Identifying as nonwhite, being under age 25, being at or below the federal poverty level, and having medium or low decision certainty about the abortion were associated with increased odds of viewing. Being age 30 and over, having previously been pregnant and being more than 9 weeks gestation were associated with decreased odds of viewing.
Conclusions: Many women seeking abortion care want to view their ultrasound image when offered the opportunity.
Keywords: Abortion; First-trimester abortion; Medication abortion; Second-trimester abortion; Ultrasound.
© 2013.
Similar articles
-
Evaluating the impact of a mandatory pre-abortion ultrasound viewing law: A mixed methods study.PLoS One. 2017 Jul 26;12(7):e0178871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178871. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28746377 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond political claims: women's interest in and emotional response to viewing their ultrasound image in abortion care.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014 Dec;46(4):185-91. doi: 10.1363/46e2414. Epub 2014 Sep 10. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014. PMID: 25209369
-
A qualitative study of women's decision to view or not view an ultrasound image before early medication abortion.Womens Health Issues. 2014 Jul-Aug;24(4):e413-8. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.04.004. Womens Health Issues. 2014. PMID: 24981400
-
Abortion in the United States.Annu Rev Public Health. 2005;26:501-12. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144351. Annu Rev Public Health. 2005. PMID: 15760299 Review.
-
Developments in laws on induced abortion: 1998-2007.Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2008 Sep;34(3):110-20. doi: 10.1363/ifpp.34.110.08. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2008. PMID: 18957353 Review.
Cited by
-
The option to look: patient-centred pregnancy tissue viewing at independent abortion clinics in the United States.Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020 Dec;28(1):1730122. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2020.1730122. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020. PMID: 32188353 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the impact of a mandatory pre-abortion ultrasound viewing law: A mixed methods study.PLoS One. 2017 Jul 26;12(7):e0178871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178871. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28746377 Free PMC article.
-
Perspectives on Abortion Services, the Pre-Abortion Visit, and Telemedicine Abortion: A Qualitative Study in Sweden.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Mar;57(1):36-44. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12290. Epub 2025 Jan 12. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2025. PMID: 39800999 Free PMC article.
-
A global scoping review of the circumstances of care seeking for abortion later in pregnancy.PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Dec 5;4(12):e0003965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003965. eCollection 2024. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39636911 Free PMC article.
-
Viewing the image? Ultrasound examination during abortion preparations, ethical challenges.Nurs Ethics. 2022 Mar;29(2):511-522. doi: 10.1177/09697330211051009. Epub 2021 Dec 6. Nurs Ethics. 2022. PMID: 34872423 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical