Outcome and impact of surgery in paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: a cardiac catheterization study
- PMID: 24030412
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000031
Outcome and impact of surgery in paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: a cardiac catheterization study
Abstract
Background: The clinical relevance and management of paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (LFLG-AS) with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction remain debated. The aim of this study is to determine the features and outcome of LFLG-AS assessed using cardiac catheterization.
Methods and results: Between 2000 and 2010, 768 patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (>50%) and severe AS (valve area ≤ 1 cm(2)) without other valvular disease underwent cardiac catheterization. Mean age was 74 ± 8 years, 42% were women, and 46% had associated coronary artery disease. The prevalence of LFLG (indexed left ventricular stroke volume <35 mL/m(2) and mean gradient <40 mm Hg), normal flow high gradient, normal flow low gradient, and low flow high gradient were 13%, 50%, 22%, and 15%, respectively. Compared with patients with normal flow high gradient, those with LFLG were significantly older, with significantly reduced systemic arterial compliance and vascular resistances and increased valvulo-arterial impedance (all P<0.05). Ten-year survival was reduced in LFLG-AS (32 ± 9%) compared with normal flow high gradient (66 ± 4%; P=0.0002). After adjustment for other risk factors, LFLG-AS was independently associated with reduced long-term survival (hazard ratio, 1.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-3.07; P=0.02). However, despite higher operative mortality, patients with LFLG-AS undergoing aortic valve replacement seemed to have better long-term survival than those managed conservatively (5-year survival rate: 63 ± 6% versus 38 ± 15%; P=0.007; hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.59; P=0.002).
Conclusions: This large cardiac catheterization-based study reports that the LFLG-AS entity is not rare and is associated with worse outcome whether treated medically or surgically. However, these patients may have better long-term survival if treated surgically. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm this finding.
Keywords: LV function; aortic stenosis; catheterization; surgery; survival; valve.
Similar articles
-
Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival.Circulation. 2007 Jun 5;115(22):2856-64. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.668681. Epub 2007 May 28. Circulation. 2007. PMID: 17533183
-
Outcome of patients with aortic stenosis, small valve area, and low-flow, low-gradient despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Oct 2;60(14):1259-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.054. Epub 2012 May 30. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 22657269
-
Impact of flow and left ventricular strain on outcome of patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction and low gradient severe aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement.Am J Cardiol. 2014 Dec 15;114(12):1875-81. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.09.030. Epub 2014 Sep 28. Am J Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 25438916
-
Low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis in patients with normal ejection fraction.Curr Opin Cardiol. 2013 Sep;28(5):524-30. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e32836245e0. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 23835947 Review.
-
Integration of Flow-Gradient Patterns Into Clinical Decision Making for Patients With Suspected Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved LVEF: A Systematic Review of Evidence and Meta-Analysis.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Nov;9(11):1255-1263. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.01.035. Epub 2016 Aug 17. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016. PMID: 27544900
Cited by
-
Prognosis in asymptomatic patients with discordantly graded aortic valve stenosis based on pressure recovery adjusted valve area.Open Heart. 2022 Nov;9(2):e002159. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002159. Open Heart. 2022. PMID: 36428084 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Impact of left ventricular remodelling patterns on outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis.Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Dec 1;18(12):1378-1387. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jew288. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017. PMID: 28064154 Free PMC article.
-
Low-gradient aortic stenosis.Eur Heart J. 2016 Sep 7;37(34):2645-57. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw096. Epub 2016 Mar 31. Eur Heart J. 2016. PMID: 27190103 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Patterns of left ventricular remodeling in aortic stenosis: therapeutic implications.Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2015 Jul;17(7):391. doi: 10.1007/s11936-015-0391-0. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2015. PMID: 25991029
-
Workup and Management of Patients With Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2018 May 2;20(6):49. doi: 10.1007/s11936-018-0642-y. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2018. PMID: 29721704 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials