Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2013 Sep 16:10:50.
doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-10-50.

The effects of pregnancy intention on the use of antenatal care services: systematic review and meta-analysis

Yohannes Dibaba  1 , Mesganaw Fantahun, Michelle J Hindin
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The effects of pregnancy intention on the use of antenatal care services: systematic review and meta-analysis

Yohannes Dibaba et al. Reprod Health. .

Abstract

Background: There has been considerable debate in the reproductive health literature as to whether unintended pregnancy influences use of maternal health services, particularly antenatal care. Despite the wealth of studies examining the association between pregnancy intention and antenatal care, findings remain mixed and inconclusive. The objective of this study is to systematically review and meta-analyse studies on the association between pregnancy intention and antenatal care.

Methods: We reviewed studies reporting on pregnancy intention and antenatal care from PubMed, Popline, CINHAL and Jstor search engines by developing search strategies. Study quality was assessed for biases in selection, definition of exposure and outcome variables, confounder adjustment, and type of analyses. Adjusted odds ratios, standard errors and sample size were extracted from the included studies and meta-analyzed using STATA version 11. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using Q test statistic. Effect-size was measured by Odds ratio. Pooled odds ratio for the effects of unintended pregnancy on the use of antenatal care services were calculated using the random effects model.

Results: Our results indicate increased odds of delayed antenatal care use among women with unintended pregnancies (OR 1.42 with 95% CI, 1.27, 1.59) as compared to women with intended pregnancies. Sub-group analysis for developed (1.50 with 95% CI, 1.34, 1.68) and developing (1. 36 with 95% CI, 1.13, 1.65) countries showed significant associations. Moreover, there is an increased odds of inadequate antenatal care use among women with unintended pregnancies as compared to women with intended pregnancies (OR 1.64, 95% CI: 1.47, 1.82). Subgroup analysis for developed (OR, 1.86; 95% CI: 1.62, 2.14) and developing (OR, 1.54; 95% CI: 1.33, 1.77) countries also showed a statistically significant association. However, there were heterogeneities in the studies included in this analysis.

Conclusion: Unintended pregnancy is associated with late initiation and inadequate use of antenatal care services. Hence, women who report an unintended pregnancy should be targeted for antenatal care counseling and services to prevent adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Moreover, providing information on the importance of planning and healthy timing of pregnancies, and the means to do so, to all women of reproductive ages is essential.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic presentation of studies included in the Analysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest Plot of delayed Antenatal care among women with unintended vs intended pregnancies.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest Plot of Inadequate ANC among women with unintended vs intended pregnancies.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. WHO. The World Health Report 2005 - make every mother and child count. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2005.
    1. WHO. Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2008: Estimates Developed by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, and the World Bank. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2010.
    1. Campbell OM, Graham WJ. Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works. Lancet. 2006;368(9543):1284–1299. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69381-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. WHO. Antenatal Care in developing Countries: Promises, Achievements and Missed Opportunities. An Analysis of Trends, levels and Differentials, 1990-2001. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2003.
    1. Parkhurst JO, Penn-Kekana L, Blaauw D, Balabanova D, Danishevski K, Rahman SA. et al. Health systems factors influencing maternal health services: a four-country comparison. Health Policy. 2005;73(2):127–138. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.11.001. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources