Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May;47(5):896-905.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.06.010. Epub 2013 Sep 12.

Decisional control preferences, disclosure of information preferences, and satisfaction among Hispanic patients with advanced cancer

Antonio Noguera  1 , Sriram Yennurajalingam  2 , Isabel Torres-Vigil  3 , Henrique Afonseca Parsons  2 , Eva Rosina Duarte  4 , Alejandra Palma  5 , Sofia Bunge  6 , J Lynn Palmer  7 , Eduardo Bruera  8
Affiliations

Decisional control preferences, disclosure of information preferences, and satisfaction among Hispanic patients with advanced cancer

Antonio Noguera et al. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 May.

Abstract

Context: Studies to determine the decisional control preferences (DCPs) in Hispanic patients receiving palliative care are limited.

Objectives: The aims of this study were to describe DCPs, disclosure of information, and satisfaction with decision making among Hispanics and to determine the degree of concordance between patients' DCPs and their self-reported decisions.

Methods: We surveyed 387 cancer patients referred to outpatient palliative care clinics in Argentina, Chile, Guatemala, and the U.S. DCPs were measured with the Control Preference Scale, disclosure preferences with the Disclosure of Information Preferences questionnaire, and satisfaction with care with the Satisfaction with Decision Scale.

Results: In this study, 182 patients (47.6%) preferred shared decisional control, 119 (31.2%) preferred active decisional control, and 81 (21.2%) preferred a passive approach. Concerning their diagnosis and prognosis, 345 (92%) patients wanted to know their diagnosis, and 355 (94%) wanted to know their prognosis. Three hundred thirty-seven (87%) patients were satisfied with the decision-making process. DCPs were concordant with the self-reported decision-making process in 264 (69%) patients (weighted kappa = 0.55). Patients' greater satisfaction with the decision-making process was correlated with older age (P ≤ 0.001) and with a preference for enhanced diagnostic disclosure (P ≤ 0.024). Satisfaction did not correlate with concordance in the decision-making process.

Conclusion: The vast majority preferred a shared or active decision-making process and wanted information about their diagnosis and prognosis. Older patients and those who wanted to know their diagnosis seemed to be more satisfied with the way treatment decisions were made.

Keywords: Palliative care; advanced cancer; decisional control preferences; disclosure of information preferences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. AU: PLS CONFIRM THIS LAST SENTENCE IS ACCURATE.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Degner LF, Kristjanson LJ, Bowman D, et al. Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. JAMA. 1997;277:1485–1492. - PubMed
    1. Bruera E, Sweeney C, Calder K, Palmer L, Benisch-Tolley S. Patient preferences versus physician perceptions of treatment decisions in cancer care. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:2883–2885. - PubMed
    1. Singh JA, Sloan JA, Atherton PJ, et al. Preferred roles in treatment decision making among patients with cancer: a pooled analysis of studies using the Control Preferences Scale. Am J Manag Care. 2010;16:688–696. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bélanger E, Rodríguez C, Groleau D. Shared decision-making in palliative care: a systematic mixed studies review using narrative synthesis. Palliat Med. 2011;25:242–261. - PubMed
    1. Werth JL, Blevins D, Chang VT, Sambamoorthi N. Decision-making in palliative care. In: Werth JL, Blevins D, editors. Decision making near the end of life: Issues, development, and future directions. New York: Brunner-Routledge; 2008. pp. 143–168.

Publication types

MeSH terms