Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Oct;398(7):925-9.
doi: 10.1007/s00423-013-1113-2. Epub 2013 Sep 15.

Current advances in single-port laparoscopic surgery

Affiliations
Review

Current advances in single-port laparoscopic surgery

Th Carus. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: Single-port laparoscopic surgery has the intention to further minimize the access trauma similar to natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. While special trocars and instruments are needed, the spectrum of clinical indications corresponds to the conventional laparoscopic surgery. This review gives an overview of the current applications and advances in single-port laparoscopic surgery.

Methods: The PubMed database was searched for "single incision laparoscopic surgery" or "single port" and different operations (e.g., cholecystectomy, colectomy, and appendectomy). The references and our own experiences were considered for historic development and current advances.

Results: The spreading of single-port laparoscopic surgery is not as fast as expected. References show that operations using a single-port technique are feasible, safe, and efficient. More technical difficulties for the surgeon and higher costs must be considered. A better cosmetic result, less postoperative pain, and a faster recovery could be potential benefits for the patients.

Conclusions: Current advances in single-port laparoscopic surgery are difficult to define. The most common procedures are single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomies, colectomies, and appendectomies. Significant clinical benefits have not yet been proven even in prospective, randomized studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Surg Endosc. 2010 Sep;24(9):2236-40 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2010 Nov;24(11):2765-9 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2012 May;26(5):1205-13 - PubMed
    1. Arch Surg. 2007 Sep;142(9):823-6; discussion 826-7 - PubMed
    1. Chirurg. 2011 May;82(5):411-4, 416-8 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources