Below replacement fertility preferences in Shanghai
- PMID: 24039621
- PMCID: PMC3769784
- DOI: 10.3917/pope.1103.0519
Below replacement fertility preferences in Shanghai
Abstract
China has joined the group of low-fertility countries; it has a TFR somewhere in the range of 1.4 to 1.6. Much speculation about China's future fertility depends on whether individual's fertility intentions and preferences are much higher than the state's fertility goals. If so, then a relaxation of family planning restrictions could lead to a substantial fertility increase. We directly ask a probability sample of Shanghai registered residents and migrants whether a policy relaxation would lead them to have additional children. Our results show that small families (one or two children) are intended in this urban setting. If family planning policy were relaxed, a relatively small fraction (fewer than 14%) reports that they would revise their intentions upward. Even this modest increase (as much as 10%) is suspect because factors that can deflate fertility relative to intentions are likely more powerful than the inflationary ones (in Shanghai). These empirical findings help ground speculations on the future of fertility in the hypothetical absence of policy constraints.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Shanghai: a case study of negative population growth.Chin J Popul Sci. 1995;7(3):267-76. Chin J Popul Sci. 1995. PMID: 12290862
-
The one-child solution: declining fertility in China.IDRC Rep. 1986 Jul;15(3):22-3. IDRC Rep. 1986. PMID: 12280617
-
China's population policy successful.China Popul Newsl. 1987 Jun;4(3):1-3. China Popul Newsl. 1987. PMID: 12281422
-
Effects of the one-child family policy on second and third births in Hebei, Shaanxi and Shanghai.J Popul Econ. 1994 Feb;7(1):63-78. doi: 10.1007/BF00160438. J Popul Econ. 1994. PMID: 12287549
-
A brief introduction to China's family planning programme.China Popul Newsl. 1984 Aug;1(3):4-10. China Popul Newsl. 1984. PMID: 12266994
Cited by
-
China's Population Policy at the Crossroads: Social Impacts and Prospects.Asian J Soc Sci. 2013;41(2):193-218. doi: 10.1163/15685314-12341298. Asian J Soc Sci. 2013. PMID: 26612983 Free PMC article.
-
If Science Had Come First: A Billion Person Fable for the Ages (A Reply to Comments).Demography. 2018 Apr;55(2):743-768. doi: 10.1007/s13524-018-0661-z. Demography. 2018. PMID: 29623609 No abstract available.
-
Association of China's universal two child policy with changes in births and birth related health factors: national, descriptive comparative study.BMJ. 2019 Aug 21;366:l4680. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4680. BMJ. 2019. PMID: 31434652 Free PMC article.
-
An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Recruitment Patterns on RDS Estimates among a Socially Ordered Population of Female Sex Workers in China.Sociol Methods Res. 2013 Aug;42(3):10.1177/0049124113494576. doi: 10.1177/0049124113494576. Sociol Methods Res. 2013. PMID: 24288418 Free PMC article.
-
The Positive Effect of Women's Education on Fertility in Low-Fertility China.Eur J Popul. 2022 Feb 7;38(1):125-161. doi: 10.1007/s10680-021-09603-2. eCollection 2022 Mar. Eur J Popul. 2022. PMID: 35370527 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Attané I. Chinese fertility on the eve of the 21st century: Fact and uncertainty. Population-E. 2001;13(2):71–100.
-
- Attané I. China’s family planning policy: An overview of its past and future. Studies in Family Planning. 2002;33(1):103–113. - PubMed
-
- Bongaarts J. Fertility and reproductive preferences in post-transitional societies. Population and Development Review. 2001;27(Supp):260–281.
-
- Bongaarts J, Feeney G. On the quantum and tempo of fertility. Population and Development Review. 1998;24:271–291.
-
- Bongaarts J, Watkins SC. Social interactions and contemporary fertility transitions. Population and Development Review. 1996;22(4):639–682.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources