Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Sep 5;8(9):e72465.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072465. eCollection 2013.

Development and validation of a questionnaire to detect behavior change in multiple advance care planning behaviors

Affiliations

Development and validation of a questionnaire to detect behavior change in multiple advance care planning behaviors

Rebecca L Sudore et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Introduction: Advance directives have traditionally been considered the gold standard for advance care planning. However, recent evidence suggests that advance care planning involves a series of multiple discrete behaviors for which people are in varying stages of behavior change. The goal of our study was to develop and validate a survey to measure the full advance care planning process.

Methods: The Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey assesses "Process Measures" of factors known from Behavior Change Theory to affect behavior (knowledge, contemplation, self-efficacy, and readiness, using 5-point Likert scales) and "Action Measures" (yes/no) of multiple behaviors related to surrogate decision makers, values and quality of life, flexibility for surrogate decision making, and informed decision making. We administered surveys at baseline and 1 week later to 50 diverse, older adults from San Francisco hospitals. Internal consistency reliability of Process Measures was assessed using Cronbach's alpha (only continuous variables) and test-retest reliability of Process and Action Measures was examined using intraclass correlations. For discriminant validity, we compared Process and Action Measure scores between this cohort and 20 healthy college students (mean age 23.2 years, SD 2.7).

Results: Mean age was 69.3 (SD 10.5) and 42% were non-White. The survey took a mean of 21.4 minutes (±6.2) to administer. The survey had good internal consistency (Process Measures Cronbach's alpha, 0.94) and test-retest reliability (Process Measures intraclass correlation, 0.70; Action Measures, 0.87). Both Process and Action Measure scores were higher in the older than younger group, p<.001.

Conclusion: A new Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey that measures behavior change (knowledge, contemplation, self-efficacy, and readiness) and multiple advance care planning actions demonstrates good reliability and validity. Further research is needed to assess whether survey scores improve in response to advance care planning interventions and whether scores are associated with receipt of care consistent with one's wishes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. *Each Behavioral Change Process factor (knowledge, contemplation, self-efficacy, and readiness) affects engagement in each of the 4 advance care planning domains (Decision Makers (DM), Quality of life (QOL), Flexibility, and Asking Questions) including the distinct planning behaviors within those domains, such as how informed one feels about DM (knowledge), how much one has thought about DM (contemplation), how confident one feels to ask a DM (self-efficacy), and how ready one feels to ask a DM (readiness).
Engagement in these Behavioral Change Processes can then lead to Action pertaining to each of the 4 advance care planning domains, including individual behaviors within those domains, such as whether the participant actually decided on, asked, discussed, and/or documented their preferred DM.

References

    1. Sudore RL, Fried TR (2010) Redefining the “planning” in advance care planning: preparing for end-of-life decision making. Ann Intern Med 153: 256–261. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ramsaroop SD, Reid MC, Adelman RD (2007) Completing an advance directive in the primary care setting: what do we need for success? J Am Geriatr Soc 55: 277–283. - PubMed
    1. Fried TR, Redding CA, Robbins ML, Paiva A, O'Leary JR, et al. (2010) Stages of change for the component behaviors of advance care planning. J Am Geriatr Soc 58: 2329–2336. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sudore RL, Schickedanz AD, Landefeld CS, Williams BA, Lindquist K, et al. (2008) Engagement in multiple steps of the advance care planning process: a descriptive study of diverse older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 56: 1006–1013. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84: 191–215. - PubMed

Publication types