Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Sep 10;8(9):e74579.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074579. eCollection 2013.

Describing temperament in an ungulate: a multidimensional approach

Affiliations

Describing temperament in an ungulate: a multidimensional approach

Katharina L Graunke et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Studies on animal temperament have often described temperament using a one-dimensional scale, whereas theoretical framework has recently suggested two or more dimensions using terms like "valence" or "arousal" to describe these dimensions. Yet, the valence or assessment of a situation is highly individual. The aim of this study was to provide support for the multidimensional framework with experimental data originating from an economically important species (Bos taurus). We tested 361 calves at 90 days post natum (dpn) in a novel-object test. Using a principal component analysis (PCA), we condensed numerous behaviours into fewer variables to describe temperament and correlated these variables with simultaneously measured heart rate variability (HRV) data. The PCA resulted in two behavioural dimensions (principal components, PC): novel-object-related (PC 1) and exploration-activity-related (PC 2). These PCs explained 58% of the variability in our data. The animals were distributed evenly within the two behavioural dimensions independent of their sex. Calves with different scores in these PCs differed significantly in HRV, and thus in the autonomous nervous system's activity. Based on these combined behavioural and physiological data we described four distinct temperament types resulting from two behavioural dimensions: "neophobic/fearful--alert", "interested--stressed", "subdued/uninterested--calm", and "neoophilic/outgoing--alert". Additionally, 38 calves were tested at 90 and 197 dpn. Using the same PCA-model, they correlated significantly in PC 1 and tended to correlate in PC 2 between the two test ages. Of these calves, 42% expressed a similar behaviour pattern in both dimensions and 47% in one. No differences in temperament scores were found between sexes or breeds. In conclusion, we described distinct temperament types in calves based on behavioural and physiological measures emphasising the benefits of a multidimensional approach.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Scores plot of the crossbreed calves.
Scores plot of 361 crossbreed calves gained from the standardised original data of the novel-object test and the respective loadings in the two PCs (Table 3), including the classification into nine score classes, numbered with Roman numerals; a range of ± 0.5 SD from the zero line was defined as threshold for the intermediate level.
Figure 2
Figure 2. 3D scores plot including the RMSSD/SDNN-ratio.
Smoothed 3D scores plot of 361 crossbreed calves during the novel-object test (NO) with the ratio of RMSSD/SDNN between NO and base measurement as the third dimension; colour spectrum from dark blue (strongly sympathetically activated) to red (strongly parasympathetically activated), smoother “running median”, bandwidth method “nearest neighbours”, and sampling proportion 0.100 (SigmaPlot 10.0, SysStat Software Inc., USA).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Score changes between the test ages separately for each principal component (PC).
Changes in behavioural score between the test ages presented separately for (A) PC 1 and (B) PC 2 of 18 Charolais calves (black dots) and 20 Holstein Friesian calves (grey dots); solid black line marks 100% stability over time, dashed grey line marks the trend line.

References

    1. Manteca X, Deag JM (1993) Individual differences in temperament of domestic animals: a review of methodology. Anim Welf 2: 247-268.
    1. Locurto C (2007) Individual differences and animal personality. Comp Cogn Behav Rev 2: 67-78.
    1. Wolf M, Weissing FJ (2010) An explanatory framework for adaptive personality differences. Philos Trans R Soc B 365: 3959-3968. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0215. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grandin T (1993) Behavioral Agitation During Handling of Cattle Is Persistent Over Time. Appl Anim Behav Sci 36: 1-9. doi:10.1016/0168-1591(93)90094-6. - DOI
    1. Grignard L, Boivin X, Boissy A, Le Neindre P (2001) Do beef cattle react consistently to different handling situations? Appl Anim Behav Sci 71: 263-276. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00187-8. PubMed: 11248377. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources