Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Sep 1;6(8):677-82.
eCollection 2013.

PDLIM5 gene polymorphisms and short term antidepressant response in Chinese major depressive disorders

Affiliations

PDLIM5 gene polymorphisms and short term antidepressant response in Chinese major depressive disorders

Zhongchun Liu et al. Int J Clin Exp Med. .

Abstract

Several investigations have suggested that PDLIM5 plays a key role in the pathophysiology of major depressive disorder (MDD), and that PDLIM5 might be a therapeutic target for the action of antidepressant. In this study, we sought to investigate whether variations of PDLIM5 gene sequence could predict response to antidepressants in MDD patients. We selected 3 SNPs (rs10008257, rs2433320, 2452600) of PDLIM5 gene, and performed an association analysis of PDLIM5 and the efficacy of fluoxetine treatment in 185 Han Chinese MDD patients. The results show that the rs2433320 of PDLIM5 gene are associated with fluoxetine therapeutic response in MDD patients (X(2) = 8.2960, df = 2, P = 0.0145) after correction with the Bonferroni multiple test, the HAMD score of the GG genotype group was significantly lower than that of the AA and AG genotype group at 1, 2, 4 and 6 weeks. The results support the idea that the PDLIM5 gene is likely to be involved in the antidepressant response in MDD.

Keywords: PDLIM5; antidepressant; major depressive disorder; pharmacogenetics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
HAMD scores during 6 weeks of fluoxetine treatment in three PDLIM5 rs2433320 genotype groupsa. aEach point represents the mean score ± SEM. Differences in the HAMD scores at each evaluation point were examined with the use of one-way factorial ANOVA followed by Fisher’s PLSD test. bSignificant differences at each point between the AA and G/G groups (p = 0.0223 at week 1, p = 0.0005 at week 2, p = 0.0011 at week 4 and p = 0.0133 at week 6). cSignificant difference at each point between the AG and G/G groups (p = 0.0001 at week 1, p = 0.0001 at week 2, p = 0.0001 at week 4 and p = 0.0032 at week 6).

References

    1. Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, Nierenberg AA, Stewart JW, Warden D, Niederehe G, Thase ME, Lavori PW, Lebowitz BD, McGrath PJ, Rosenbaum JF, Sackeim HA, Kupfer DJ, Luther J, Fava M. Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STARD report. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:1905–1917. - PubMed
    1. Thase ME, Haight BR, Richard N, Rockett CB, Mitton M, Modell JG, VanMeter S, Harriett AE, Wang Y. Remission rates following antidepressant therapy with bupropion or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: a meta-analysis of original data from 7 randomized controlled trials. J Clin Psychiatry. 2005;66:974–981. - PubMed
    1. Weizman S, Gonda X, Dome P, Faludi G. Pharmacogenetics of antidepressive drugs: a way towards personalized treatment of major depressive disorder. Neuropsychopharmacol Hung. 2012;14:87–101. - PubMed
    1. Keers R, Aitchison KJ. Pharmacogenetics of antidepressant response. Expert Rev Neurother. 2011;11:101–125. - PubMed
    1. Maeno-Hikichi Y, Chang S, Matsumura K, Lai M, Lin H, Nakagawa N, Kuroda S, Zhang JF. A PKC epsilon-ENH-channel complex specifically modulates N-type Ca2+ channels. Nat Neurosci. 2003;6:468–475. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources