Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Sep 13:6:21518.
doi: 10.3402/gha.v6i0.21518.

Revising the WHO verbal autopsy instrument to facilitate routine cause-of-death monitoring

Affiliations

Revising the WHO verbal autopsy instrument to facilitate routine cause-of-death monitoring

Jordana Leitao et al. Glob Health Action. .

Abstract

Objective: Verbal autopsy (VA) is a systematic approach for determining causes of death (CoD) in populations without routine medical certification. It has mainly been used in research contexts and involved relatively lengthy interviews. Our objective here is to describe the process used to shorten, simplify, and standardise the VA process to make it feasible for application on a larger scale such as in routine civil registration and vital statistics (CRVS) systems.

Methods: A literature review of existing VA instruments was undertaken. The World Health Organization (WHO) then facilitated an international consultation process to review experiences with existing VA instruments, including those from WHO, the Demographic Evaluation of Populations and their Health in Developing Countries (INDEPTH) Network, InterVA, and the Population Health Metrics Research Consortium (PHMRC). In an expert meeting, consideration was given to formulating a workable VA CoD list [with mapping to the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) CoD] and to the viability and utility of existing VA interview questions, with a view to undertaking systematic simplification.

Findings: A revised VA CoD list was compiled enabling mapping of all ICD-10 CoD onto 62 VA cause categories, chosen on the grounds of public health significance as well as potential for ascertainment from VA. A set of 221 indicators for inclusion in the revised VA instrument was developed on the basis of accumulated experience, with appropriate skip patterns for various population sub-groups. The duration of a VA interview was reduced by about 40% with this new approach.

Conclusions: The revised VA instrument resulting from this consultation process is presented here as a means of making it available for widespread use and evaluation. It is envisaged that this will be used in conjunction with automated models for assigning CoD from VA data, rather than involving physicians.

Keywords: InterVA; World Health Organization; cause of death; civil registration; verbal autopsy; vital registration; vital statistics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Illustration of literature search and review process.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Global distribution of verbal autopsy studies.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Use of different VA instruments over time.

References

    1. Murray CJ, Lopez AD, Shibuya K, Lozano R. Verbal autopsy: advancing science, facilitating application. Popul Health Metr. 2011;9:18. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fottrell E, Byass P. Verbal autopsy: methods in transition. Epidemiol Rev. 2010;32:38–55. - PubMed
    1. Setel PW. Verbal autopsy and global mortality statistics: if not now, then when? Popul Health Metr. 2011;9:20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Byass P. Who needs cause-of-death data? PLoS Med. 2007;4:e333. - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007. Verbal autopsy standards: ascertaining and attributing cause of death.

LinkOut - more resources