Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul-Aug;74(4):287-96.

Development and validation of a primary care-based family health history and decision support program (MeTree)

Lori A Orlando  1 , Adam H Buchanan, Susan E Hahn, Carol A Christianson, Karen P Powell, Celette Sugg Skinner, Blair Chesnut, Colette Blach, Barbara Due, Geoffrey S Ginsburg, Vincent C Henrich
Affiliations

Development and validation of a primary care-based family health history and decision support program (MeTree)

Lori A Orlando et al. N C Med J. 2013 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Introduction: Family health history is a strong predictor of disease risk. To reduce the morbidity and mortality of many chronic diseases, risk-stratified evidence-based guidelines strongly encourage the collection and synthesis of family health history to guide selection of primary prevention strategies. However, the collection and synthesis of such information is not well integrated into clinical practice. To address barriers to collection and use of family health histories, the Genomedical Connection developed and validated MeTree, a Web-based, patient-facing family health history collection and clinical decision support tool. MeTree is designed for integration into primary care practices as part of the genomic medicine model for primary care.

Methods: We describe the guiding principles, operational characteristics, algorithm development, and coding used to develop MeTree. Validation was performed through stakeholder cognitive interviewing, a genetic counseling pilot program, and clinical practice pilot programs in 2 community-based primary care clinics.

Results: Stakeholder feedback resulted in changes to MeTree's interface and changes to the phrasing of clinical decision support documents. The pilot studies resulted in the identification and correction of coding errors and the reformatting of clinical decision support documents. MeTree's strengths in comparison with other tools are its seamless integration into clinical practice and its provision of action-oriented recommendations guided by providers' needs.

Limitations: The tool was validated in a small cohort.

Conclusion: MeTree can be integrated into primary care practices to help providers collect and synthesize family health history information from patients with the goal of improving adherence to risk-stratified evidence-based guidelines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1. Example of Decision Support: Patient Report
Note. Reprinted from Orlando et al [19].
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2. Example of Decision Support: Provider Report
Note. Reprinted from Orlando et al [19].
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Greenland P, Alpert JS, Beller GA, et al. 2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(25):e50–e103. - PubMed
    1. Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-Update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology. 2003;124(2):544–560. - PubMed
    1. Watson EK, Shickle D, Qureshi N, Emery J, Austoker J. The “new genetics” and primary care: GPs’ views on their role and their educational needs. Fam Pract. 1999;16(4):420–425. - PubMed
    1. Acton RT, Burst NM, Casebeer L, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of Alabama’s primary care physicians regarding cancer genetics. Acad Med. 2000;75(8):850–852. - PubMed
    1. Fry A, Campbell H, Gudmunsdottir H, et al. GPs’ views on their role in cancer genetics services and current practice. Fam Pract. 1999;16(5):468–474. - PubMed

Publication types