Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct 15;109(8):2027-34.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.569. Epub 2013 Sep 17.

Emergency presentation of cancer and short-term mortality

Affiliations

Emergency presentation of cancer and short-term mortality

S McPhail et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: The short-term survival following a cancer diagnosis in England is lower than that in comparable countries, with the difference in excess mortality primarily occurring in the months immediately after diagnosis. We assess the impact of emergency presentation (EP) on the excess mortality in England over the course of the year following diagnosis.

Methods: All colorectal and cervical cancers presenting in England and all breast, lung, and prostate cancers in the East of England in 2006-2008 are included. The variation in the likelihood of EP with age, stage, sex, co-morbidity, and income deprivation is modelled. The excess mortality over 0-1, 1-3, 3-6, and 6-12 months after diagnosis and its dependence on these case-mix factors and presentation route is then examined.

Results: More advanced stage and older age are predictive of EP, as to a lesser extent are co-morbidity, higher income deprivation, and female sex. In the first month after diagnosis, we observe case-mix-adjusted excess mortality rate ratios of 7.5 (cervical), 5.9 (colorectal), 11.7 (breast ), 4.0 (lung), and 20.8 (prostate) for EP compared with non-EP.

Conclusion: Individuals who present as an emergency experience high short-term mortality in all cancer types examined compared with non-EPs. This is partly a case-mix effect but EP remains predictive of short-term mortality even when age, stage, and co-morbidity are accounted for.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Unadjusted excess mortality rates for emergency (dotted), non-emergency (dashed), and all presentation (solid) routes in the periods 0–1, 1–3, 3–6, and 6–12 months after diagnosis, plotted semilogarithmically at the central point of those periods with 95% confidence intervals. Figures represent all persons diagnosed with selected cancer types in England (cervical and colorectal cancer) and the ECRIC registration area (breast, lung, and prostate cancer), 2006–2008. Stage and co-morbidity include imputed values.

References

    1. Abdel-Rahman M, Stockton D, Rachet B, Hakulinen T, Coleman MP. What if cancer survival in Britain were the same as in Europe: how many deaths are avoidable. Br J Cancer. 2009;101 (Suppl 2:S115–S124. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berrino F, De Angelis R, Sant M, Rosso S, Lasota MB, Coebergh JWW, Santaquilani M, EUROCARE Working Group Survival for eight major cancers and all cancers combined for European adults diagnosed in 1995 –1999: results of the EUROCARE-4 study. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:773–783. - PubMed
    1. Blaney J, Gavin A. Why cancer patients die in acute hospitals: a retrospective study by note review. N Ireland Cancer Registry. 2011.
    1. Bottle A, Tsang C, Parsons C, Majeed A, Soljak M, Aylin P. Association between patient and general practice characteristics and unplanned first-time admissions for cancer: observational study. Br J Cancer. 2012;107:1213–1219. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brewster DH, Clark DI, Stockton DL, Munro AJ, Steele RJC. Characteristics of patients dying with 30 days of diagnosis of breast or colorectal cancer in Scotland, 2003-2007. Br J Cancer. 2011;104:60–67. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms