Are patients' personal goals achieved after pelvic reconstructive surgery?
- PMID: 24045936
- PMCID: PMC4184208
- DOI: 10.1007/s00192-013-2222-8
Are patients' personal goals achieved after pelvic reconstructive surgery?
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: Our goal was to describe patients' personal treatment goals before pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) surgery and goals achieved and not achieved 12 months after surgery, and to evaluate the association between postoperative symptoms and successful goal achievement.
Materials and methods: We performed a secondary analysis using a de-identified database from a randomized trial comparing native tissue vs. graft-augmented rectocele repair. In their own words, women listed their top four treatment goals and 12 months after surgery whether those goals were or were not achieved. We categorized goals into symptom improvement (defecatory, bulge, incontinence, pain/discomfort) and functioning (physical, social, emotional, sexual). Women completed symptom questionnaires pre- and postoperatively. Goals were described using simple statistics. The association between defecatory, bulge, and incontinence symptoms and goal achievement was described using the chi-square test.
Results: Of 160 participants in the database, 125 (78 %) met inclusion criteria. The most common preoperative goals were improvement in bulge (26.7 %), defecation (23.9 %), urinary incontinence (18.1 %), and pain/discomfort (6.2 %). Functioning goal categories included: sexual (7 %), emotional (7 %), physical (6.2 %), and social function (3.3 %). Postoperatively, goal categories in which improvement was achieved were urinary continence (70.5 %), sexual function (58.8 %), bulge reduction (56.9 %), defecation (51.7 %), physical (33.3 %), emotional (29.4 %), and social functioning (25 %). Of the women reporting postoperative defecatory or incontinence symptoms, half reported successful improvement in both goals.
Conclusions: Women predominantly reported symptom-related goals, and those goals are most frequently achieved postoperatively. Of women who reported defecatory and incontinence symptoms postoperatively, many still reported successful goal achievement in those areas.
Similar articles
-
Patient-centered goals for pelvic floor dysfunction surgery: what is success, and is it achieved?Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jul;187(1):88-92. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.124838. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002. PMID: 12114893
-
Patient-centered goals for pelvic floor dysfunction surgery: long-term follow-up.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jul;191(1):201-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.086. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004. PMID: 15295366
-
Outcomes of a comprehensive nonsurgical approach to pelvic floor rehabilitation for urinary symptoms, defecatory dysfunction, and pelvic pain.Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013 Sep-Oct;19(5):260-5. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e31829cbb9b. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013. PMID: 23982573
-
Pelvic Floor Dysfunction And Its Effect On Quality Of Sexual Life.Sex Med Rev. 2019 Oct;7(4):559-564. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2019.05.007. Epub 2019 Jul 24. Sex Med Rev. 2019. PMID: 31351916 Review.
-
Sexual satisfaction in the elderly female population: A special focus on women with gynecologic pathology.Maturitas. 2011 Nov;70(3):210-5. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2011.07.015. Epub 2011 Sep 22. Maturitas. 2011. PMID: 21943557 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Patient-reported goal attainment and comprehensive functioning outcomes after surgery compared with pessary for pelvic organ prolapse.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;215(5):659.e1-659.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.013. Epub 2016 Jun 16. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 27319365 Free PMC article.
-
International Urogynecology Consultation: Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROs) use in the evaluation of patients with pelvic organ prolapse.Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Oct;33(10):2603-2631. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05315-1. Epub 2022 Aug 18. Int Urogynecol J. 2022. PMID: 35980442
-
Pelvic organ prolapse and sexual function.Nat Rev Urol. 2020 Jul;17(7):373-390. doi: 10.1038/s41585-020-0334-8. Epub 2020 Jun 17. Nat Rev Urol. 2020. PMID: 32555435 Review.
-
Comments to: surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.Tech Coloproctol. 2016 May;20(5):327-330. doi: 10.1007/s10151-016-1448-0. Epub 2016 Apr 1. Tech Coloproctol. 2016. PMID: 27037710 No abstract available.
-
Patient experiences following prolapse surgery implementing a same-day discharge model: a prospective study.Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Dec;34(12):3005-3011. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05649-4. Epub 2023 Sep 25. Int Urogynecol J. 2023. PMID: 37747550
References
-
- Shah AD, Rajan SS, Kohli N, Hoyte L. The age distribution of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States. Int Urogynecol J. 2006;17:S409–S478.
-
- Hullfish KL, Bovbjerg VE, Gibson J, Steers WD. Patient-centered goals for pelvic floor dysfunction surgery: what is success, and is it achieved? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:88–92. - PubMed
-
- Elkadry EA, Kenton KS, FitzGerald MP, Shott S, Brubaker L. Patient-selected goals: a new perspective on surgical outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:1551–1558. - PubMed
-
- Staskin D, Tubaro A, Norton PA, Ashton-Miller JA. Mechanisms of continence and surgical cure in female andmale SUI: surgical research initiatives. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30(5):704–707. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous