Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct 31;122(18):3230-7.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-04-495515. Epub 2013 Sep 17.

Effector T cells require fatty acid metabolism during murine graft-versus-host disease

Affiliations

Effector T cells require fatty acid metabolism during murine graft-versus-host disease

Craig A Byersdorfer et al. Blood. .

Abstract

Activated T cells require increased energy to proliferate and mediate effector functions, but the metabolic changes that occur in T cells following stimulation in vivo are poorly understood, particularly in the context of inflammation. We have previously shown that T cells activated during graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) primarily rely on oxidative phosphorylation to synthesize adenosine 5'-triphosphate. Here, we demonstrate that alloreactive effector T cells (Teff) use fatty acids (FAs) as a fuel source to support their in vivo activation. Alloreactive T cells increased FA transport, elevated levels of FA oxidation enzymes, up-regulated transcriptional coactivators to drive oxidative metabolism, and increased their rates of FA oxidation. Importantly, increases in FA transport and up-regulation of FA oxidation machinery occurred specifically in T cells during GVHD and were not seen in Teff following acute activation. Pharmacological blockade of FA oxidation decreased the survival of alloreactive T cells but did not influence the survival of T cells during normal immune reconstitution. These studies suggest that pathways controlling FA metabolism might serve as therapeutic targets to treat GVHD and other T-cell-mediated immune diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Allogeneic T cells increase FA transport during GVHD. (A) B6 Ly5.2 (CD45.1+) donor T cells were loaded with CellTrace violet and transferred to irradiated B6D2F1 mice as described in “Methods.” Cells were recovered 1, 3, or 7 days after transplantation, stained for CD45.1 and TCR-β, and assessed for BoDipyC1-C12 uptake. Unmanipulated donor cells (not labeled with CellTrace) from “naïve” mice served as controls. Plots are gated on CD45.1+, TCR-β+ cells. (B) The percentage of BoDipyHi donor T cells (n ≥ 3/group). (C) Cells were preincubated with or without palmitate followed by measurement of BoDipyC1-C12 uptake as described in “Methods.” (D) Cells were processed as in A, then stained with Vibrant Dye Ruby, and the percentage of cells in G2/S/M phase from either BoDipyLo (lower 2 quartiles) or BoDipyHi (upper quartile) populations (n = 6 mice/group) was measured. (E) Donor T cells 7 days after BMT were assessed for IFN-γ production, followed by BoDipyC1-C12 uptake. **P < .004, ***P < .0001; n.s., not significant.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Allogeneic T cells up-regulate CPT1a, CPT2, and PGC1-α during GVHD. (A) Donor T cells were flow-sorted from either naïve donor animals or allogeneic recipients 7 days after BMT (GVHD) and levels of CPT1a quantitated by RT-PCR. (B) Median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of CPT1a in T cells following intracellular staining as described in Methods. Data represent 4 to 6 mice/group. (C) Intracellular CPT2 was measured by flow cytometry (supplemental Figure 4) and the results quantitated (n = 4/group). (D) Donor T cells (CD45.1+, TCR-β+, Annexin) were flow-sorted and cell lysates probed for CPT2 by western blot. Shown is 1 of 3 independent experiments. (E) T-cell lysates from spleen or liver were purified by flow-sorting and probed by western blot for levels of PGC1-α. Each lysate was pooled from ≥3 mice. **P < .006, ***P < .0001.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Day 7 allogeneic T cells increase FA oxidation ex vivo and in vivo. (A) T cells were purified by magnetic separation from naïve donors or day 7 allogeneic recipients (GVHD), incubated with 3H-palmitate for 6 hours (unstimulated), and supernatants assayed for production of 3H2O as detailed in Methods. Analysis was performed in triplicate with pooled samples and represent >3 independent experiments. Stimulated samples were incubated with 3H-palmitate for 16 hours on anti-CD3, anti-CD28–coated plates. (B) Glutamate labeled in the 4,5 position with 13C (M2 glutamate) was compared with total 13C-labeled glutamate as described in Methods. *P = .02, ***P < .005.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Allogeneic T cells from a minor histocompatibility model increase FA transport and up-regulate CPT2 and PGC1-α (A) 3 × 106 B6 Ly5.2 (CD45.1+) T cells were transplanted into irradiated C3H.SW as detailed in “Methods.” BoDipyC1-C12 uptake was measured as in Figure 1, with allogeneic T cells shown in solid black line and naïve in shaded gray. The percentage of BoDipyHi cells and the MFI of BoDipy was further quantitated (n = 9 GVHD, n = 3 naïve) and represent 2 independent experiments. (B) 105 T cells from naïve donors or minor histocompatibility allogeneic recipients (GVHD) were purified by flow-sorting and cell lysates probed for CPT2 by western blotting as in Figure 2. (C) PGC-1α levels in naïve donor or day 7 allogeneic T cells. Lamin B1 served as a loading control. n = 3 mice per lane. **P < .004, ***P < .0005.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Teff increase FA metabolism during GVHD but not following cellular immunization. (A) FA transport was measured in OT-I cells from naïve donors or in OT-I cells 7 days after either CAG.OVA dendritic cell immunization (Imm) or transplantation into irradiated CAG.OVA mice (GVHD), n = 4 mice/bar. (B) OT-I T cell lysates (following flow-sorting) were probed for PGC-1α levels by western blot as in Figure 2E. (C) B6 Ly5.2 (CD45.1+) splenocytes were labeled with CellTrace violet and transferred to nonirradiated B6D2F1 animals (GVHD) as described in “Methods.” On day 7, donor T cells were recovered and measured for BoDipyC1-C12 uptake. B6 Ly5.2 T cells transferred to nonirradiated C57Bl/6 animals served as controls (Syn). Bar graphs represent 4 to 5 mice/group. ***P < .007.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Blockade of FA oxidation preferentially targets well-divided, allogeneic T cells. (A) T cells were purified by magnetic separation and cultured ex vivo with B6D2F1 splenocytes with or without etomoxir as detailed in Methods. (B) Mice received a single dose of etomoxir on day 7 and total donor T-cell numbers were measured 16 hours later. (C) AnnexinV staining of donor T cells 16 hours after etomoxir treatment. (D) C57Bl/6 recipient mice were transplanted with BM and T cells from C3H.SW donor mice as detailed in “Methods.” Beginning on day +5, recipient mice received either PBS (black circles) or etomoxir (gray triangles) every other day for a total of 2 weeks. Clinical scores, as described previously, were measured on day 29, 10 days after the discontinuation of etomoxir. The mean clinical score is represented by a solid black line. *P = .02, **P < .01.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Homeostatic T-cell proliferation does not require FA metabolism. (A) BoDipy uptake was measured in B6 Ly5.2 donor T cells from either allogeneic (GVHD) or syngeneic (Syn) recipients as in Figure 1A. n = 3 mice/group and represent 3 independent experiments. Plots are gated on CD45.1+, TCR-β+ cells. (B) Donor T cells from allogeneic (GVHD) or syngeneic recipients were purified by flow-sorting 7 days after BMT and cell lysates probed via western blotting for PGC-1α as in Figure 2. (C) Syngeneic recipients were given a single intraperitoneal dose of PBS (white) or etomoxir (gray) 7 days post-BMT and the number of donor T cells measured 16 hours later (compare with Figure 6B). n = 8 mice/group, 1 of 2 independent experiments shown. **P < .005, n.s., not significant.

References

    1. Badovinac VP, Haring JS, Harty JT. Initial T cell receptor transgenic cell precursor frequency dictates critical aspects of the CD8(+) T cell response to infection. Immunity. 2007;26(6):827–841. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yoon H, Kim TS, Braciale TJ. The cell cycle time of CD8+ T cells responding in vivo is controlled by the type of antigenic stimulus. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(11):e15423. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kaech SM, Cui W. Transcriptional control of effector and memory CD8+ T cell differentiation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12(11):749–761. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang N, Bevan MJ. CD8(+) T cells: foot soldiers of the immune system. Immunity. 2011;35(2):161–168. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lanzavecchia A, Sallusto F. Progressive differentiation and selection of the fittest in the immune response. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2(12):982–987. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms