Autograft, allograft and bone substitutes in reconstructive orthopedic surgery
- PMID: 24046051
- DOI: 10.1007/s40520-013-0088-8
Autograft, allograft and bone substitutes in reconstructive orthopedic surgery
Abstract
Reconstruction of bone defects is a challenge for all orthopedic surgeons worldwide; to overcome this problem there are different options: the use of autografts, allografts and bone substitutes (BSs) to enhance and accelerate bone repair. Autografts have excellent biological properties but are associated with morbidity of the donor site and are restricted in volume. Allografts are available in adequate quantity but concerns still remain about the risk of infections, moreover they do not have osteogenetic properties. Bone substitutes have different indications and are very attractive for orthopedic surgeons. The present paper briefly reviews the advantages and disadvantages of autografts, allografts and BSs for bone reconstruction.
Similar articles
-
Bone graft materials and synthetic substitutes.Radiol Clin North Am. 2006 May;44(3):451-61. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2006.01.001. Radiol Clin North Am. 2006. PMID: 16644361 Review.
-
The clinical use of bone graft substitutes in orthopedic surgery in Germany-A 10-years survey from 2008 to 2018 of 1,090,167 surgical interventions.J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2022 Feb;110(2):350-357. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34911. Epub 2021 Jul 22. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2022. PMID: 34291874
-
Autograft, Allograft, and Bone Graft Substitutes: Clinical Evidence and Indications for Use in the Setting of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery.J Orthop Trauma. 2019 Apr;33(4):203-213. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001420. J Orthop Trauma. 2019. PMID: 30633080 Review.
-
Reconstruction of intercalary bone defect after resection of malignant bone tumor.J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019 Jan-Apr;27(1):2309499019832970. doi: 10.1177/2309499019832970. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019. PMID: 30879390 Review.
-
A review of bone substitutes.Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2007 Nov;19(4):513-21, vi. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2007.06.002. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2007. PMID: 18088902 Review.
Cited by
-
Imaging following surgery for primary appendicular bone tumours.Skeletal Radiol. 2021 Aug;50(8):1527-1555. doi: 10.1007/s00256-021-03712-z. Epub 2021 Jan 22. Skeletal Radiol. 2021. PMID: 33481074 Review.
-
Fully Defined 3D Hybrid System for Bone Tissue Engineering: Integration of MeHA-RGD/PCL-TCP Scaffolds With Human Stem Cells via 3D-Printed Vacuum-Assisted Cell Loading Device.J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2025 Jul 3;2025:7287217. doi: 10.1155/term/7287217. eCollection 2025. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2025. PMID: 40642420 Free PMC article.
-
Dual-functional composite scaffolds for inhibiting infection and promoting bone regeneration.Mater Today Bio. 2022 Aug 27;16:100409. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100409. eCollection 2022 Dec. Mater Today Bio. 2022. PMID: 36090611 Free PMC article. Review.
-
3D Printing-Encompassing the Facets of Dentistry.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018 Nov 22;6:172. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00172. eCollection 2018. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018. PMID: 30525032 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Treatment of severe distal humeral bone defects with three-dimensional printing technology].Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Dec 15;32(12):1534-1539. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201803008. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018. PMID: 30569679 Free PMC article. Chinese.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical