Long-term mortality after screening for colorectal cancer
- PMID: 24047060
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1300720
Long-term mortality after screening for colorectal cancer
Abstract
Background: In randomized trials, fecal occult-blood testing reduces mortality from colorectal cancer. However, the duration of the benefit is unknown, as are the effects specific to age and sex.
Methods: In the Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study, 46,551 participants, 50 to 80 years of age, were randomly assigned to usual care (control) or to annual or biennial screening with fecal occult-blood testing. Screening was performed from 1976 through 1982 and from 1986 through 1992. We used the National Death Index to obtain updated information on the vital status of participants and to determine causes of death through 2008.
Results: Through 30 years of follow-up, 33,020 participants (70.9%) died. A total of 732 deaths were attributed to colorectal cancer: 200 of the 11,072 deaths (1.8%) in the annual-screening group, 237 of the 11,004 deaths (2.2%) in the biennial-screening group, and 295 of the 10,944 deaths (2.7%) in the control group. Screening reduced colorectal-cancer mortality (relative risk with annual screening, 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56 to 0.82; relative risk with biennial screening, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.93) through 30 years of follow-up. No reduction was observed in all-cause mortality (relative risk with annual screening, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.01; relative risk with biennial screening, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.01). The reduction in colorectal-cancer mortality was larger for men than for women in the biennial-screening group (P=0.04 for interaction).
Conclusions: The effect of screening with fecal occult-blood testing on colorectal-cancer mortality persists after 30 years but does not influence all-cause mortality. The sustained reduction in colorectal-cancer mortality supports the effect of polypectomy. (Funded by the Veterans Affairs Merit Review Award Program and others.).
Comment in
-
Colorectal-cancer screening--coming of age.N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 19;369(12):1164-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1308253. N Engl J Med. 2013. PMID: 24047066 No abstract available.
-
Colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality after screening.N Engl J Med. 2013 Dec 12;369(24):2355. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1313116. N Engl J Med. 2013. PMID: 24328471 No abstract available.
-
Colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality after screening.N Engl J Med. 2013 Dec 12;369(24):2354. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1313116. N Engl J Med. 2013. PMID: 24328472 No abstract available.
-
ACP Journal Club. Annual or biennial FOBT screening reduced colorectal cancer mortality, but not all-cause mortality, at 30 years.Ann Intern Med. 2014 Jan 21;160(2):JC2. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-160-2-201401210-02002. Ann Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24445712 No abstract available.
-
Review: adding α1-blockers to 5α-reductase inhibitors improves lower urinary tract symptoms in men.Ann Intern Med. 2014 Mar 18;160(6):JC2. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-160-6-201403180-02002. Ann Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24638180 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study.N Engl J Med. 1993 May 13;328(19):1365-71. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199305133281901. N Engl J Med. 1993. PMID: 8474513 Clinical Trial.
-
Colorectal cancer mortality: effectiveness of biennial screening for fecal occult blood.J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999 Mar 3;91(5):434-7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/91.5.434. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999. PMID: 10070942
-
Fecal occult blood testing and the incidence of colorectal cancer.J Insur Med. 2002;34(2):89-91. J Insur Med. 2002. PMID: 15305783 Clinical Trial.
-
Screening for colorectal cancer.Curr Opin Gen Surg. 1994:79-84. Curr Opin Gen Surg. 1994. PMID: 7584018 Review.
-
[Colorectal cancer screening: where are we and where are we going?].Recenti Prog Med. 2013 Feb;104(2):45-8. doi: 10.1701/1241.13702. Recenti Prog Med. 2013. PMID: 23535955 Review. Italian.
Cited by
-
The impact of screening on colorectal cancer mortality and incidence: has it really made a difference?Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Mar;60(3):681-91. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3600-5. Epub 2015 Mar 5. Dig Dis Sci. 2015. PMID: 25740556 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Risk of colon perforation during colonoscopy at Baylor University Medical Center.Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2015 Jan;28(1):3-6. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2015.11929170. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2015. PMID: 25552784 Free PMC article.
-
Fecal DNA methylation markers for detecting stages of colorectal cancer and its precursors: a systematic review.Clin Epigenetics. 2020 Aug 10;12(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s13148-020-00904-7. Clin Epigenetics. 2020. PMID: 32778176 Free PMC article.
-
Disparities in Cancer Prevention in the COVID-19 Era.Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2020 Nov;13(11):893-896. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0447. Epub 2020 Sep 17. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2020. PMID: 32943438 Free PMC article.
-
The role of artificial intelligence based systems for cost optimization in colorectal cancer prevention programs.Front Artif Intell. 2022 Sep 30;5:955399. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.955399. eCollection 2022. Front Artif Intell. 2022. PMID: 36248620 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical