Surgery versus physiotherapy for stress urinary incontinence
- PMID: 24047061
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1210627
Surgery versus physiotherapy for stress urinary incontinence
Abstract
Background: Physiotherapy involving pelvic-floor muscle training is advocated as first-line treatment for stress urinary incontinence; midurethral-sling surgery is generally recommended when physiotherapy is unsuccessful. Data are lacking from randomized trials comparing these two options as initial therapy.
Methods: We performed a multicenter, randomized trial to compare physiotherapy and midurethral-sling surgery in women with stress urinary incontinence. Crossover between groups was allowed. The primary outcome was subjective improvement, measured by means of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement at 12 months.
Results: We randomly assigned 230 women to the surgery group and 230 women to the physiotherapy group. A total of 49.0% of women in the physiotherapy group and 11.2% of women in the surgery group crossed over to the alternative treatment. In an intention-to-treat analysis, subjective improvement was reported by 90.8% of women in the surgery group and 64.4% of women in the physiotherapy group (absolute difference, 26.4 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 18.1 to 34.5). The rates of subjective cure were 85.2% in the surgery group and 53.4% in the physiotherapy group (absolute difference, 31.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 22.6 to 40.3); rates of objective cure were 76.5% and 58.8%, respectively (absolute difference, 17.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 7.9 to 27.3). A post hoc per-protocol analysis showed that women who crossed over to the surgery group had outcomes similar to those of women initially assigned to surgery and that both these groups had outcomes superior to those of women who did not cross over to surgery.
Conclusions: For women with stress urinary incontinence, initial midurethral-sling surgery, as compared with initial physiotherapy, results in higher rates of subjective improvement and subjective and objective cure at 1 year. (Funded by ZonMw, the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development; Dutch Trial Register number, NTR1248.).
Comment in
-
Incontinence: Stress urinary incontinence treatment--surgery first?Nat Rev Urol. 2014 Jan;11(1):10-1. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2013.300. Epub 2013 Dec 10. Nat Rev Urol. 2014. PMID: 24323130 No abstract available.
-
Commentary on: Surgery vs physiotherapy for stress urinary incontinence.Urology. 2014 Feb;83(2):261. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.10.035. Epub 2013 Dec 19. Urology. 2014. PMID: 24360066 No abstract available.
-
Re: surgery versus physiotherapy for stress urinary incontinence.J Urol. 2014 Feb;191(2):423. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.10.120. Epub 2013 Oct 29. J Urol. 2014. PMID: 24411884 No abstract available.
-
ACP Journal Club. In women with stress urinary incontinence, initial surgery was more effective than physiotherapy.Ann Intern Med. 2014 Feb 18;160(4):JC7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-160-4-201402180-02007. Ann Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24534941 No abstract available.
-
[Methodological complexity of surgical trials].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2014;158:A7382. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2014. PMID: 24594132 Dutch.
-
Re: Surgery versus physiotherapy for stress urinary incontinence.J Urol. 2015 Feb;193(2):607. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.11.071. Epub 2014 Nov 15. J Urol. 2015. PMID: 25617283 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical