Policy decisions on endocrine disruptors should be based on science across disciplines: a response to Dietrich et al
- PMID: 24048095
- PMCID: PMC5398595
- DOI: 10.1210/en.2013-1854
Policy decisions on endocrine disruptors should be based on science across disciplines: a response to Dietrich et al
Comment on
-
Scientifically unfounded precaution drives European Commission's recommendations on EDC regulation, while defying common sense, well-established science and risk assessment principles.Chem Biol Interact. 2013 Sep 5;205(1):A1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Jul 4. Chem Biol Interact. 2013. PMID: 23832050 No abstract available.
References
-
- American Society of Human Genetics, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Endocrine Society, Genetics Society of America, Society for Developmental Biology, Society for Pediatric Urology, Society for the Study of Reproduction, Society for Gynecologic Investigation. Assessing chemical risk: societies offer expertise. Science. 2011;331:1136. - PubMed
-
- Bergman A, Heindel JJ, Jobling S, Kidd KA, Zoeller RT, eds. State of the Science of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals—2012. An Assessment of the State of the Science of Endocrine Disruptors Prepared by a Group of Experts for the United Nations Environment Programme and World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Environment Programme and the World Health Organization; 2013.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources