Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Mar;113(3):383-92.
doi: 10.1111/bju.12385.

A multicomponent theory-based intervention improves uptake of pelvic floor muscle training before radical prostatectomy: a 'before and after' cohort study

Affiliations
Free PMC article

A multicomponent theory-based intervention improves uptake of pelvic floor muscle training before radical prostatectomy: a 'before and after' cohort study

Andrew D Hirschhorn et al. BJU Int. 2014 Mar.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effect of a multicomponent theory-based intervention, incorporating patient information guides, an evidence summary, audit and feedback processes and a provider directory, in the provision/receipt of preoperative pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Subjects and methods: Over an 18-month period (9 months before and 9 months after the intervention), we measured the provision/receipt of preoperative PFMT using surveys of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy at one public hospital (n = 32) and two private hospitals (n = 107) in Western Sydney, Australia, as well as practice audits of associated public sector (n = 4) and private sector (n = 2) providers of PFMT. Self-report urinary incontinence was assessed 3 months after radical prostatectomy using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Urinary Incontinence Form (ICIQ-UI Short Form).

Results: There was a significant increase in the proportion of survey respondents receiving preoperative PFMT post-intervention (post-intervention: 42/58 respondents, 72% vs pre-intervention: 37/81 respondents, 46%, P = 0.002). There was a corresponding significant increase in provision of preoperative PFMT by private sector providers (mean [sd] post-intervention: 16.7 [3.7] patients/month vs pre-intervention: 12.1 [3.6] patients/month, P = 0.018). Respondents receiving preoperative PFMT had significantly better self-report urinary incontinence at 3 months after radical prostatectomy than those who did not receive preoperative PFMT (mean [sd] ICIQ-UI Short Form sum-scores: 6.2 [5.0] vs 9.2 [5.8], P = 0.002).

Conclusions: The intervention increased the provision/receipt of preoperative PFMT among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Additional component strategies aimed at increasing the use of public sector providers may be necessary to further improve PFMT receipt among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy in the public hospital system.

Keywords: pelvic floor muscle training; prostatectomy; translational research; urinary incontinence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of the numbers of patients consenting to receive and returning surveys pre- and post-intervention. NESB, non-English-speaking background.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
(A) Month-by-month numbers of patients provided with preoperative PFMT, pre-intervention (months 1 to 9 inclusive) and post-intervention (months 10 to 18 inclusive), separated by private vs public hospital (numbers ‘stacked’). (B) Month-by-month numbers of patients provided with postoperative PFMT alone, pre-intervention (months 1 to 9 inclusive) and post-intervention (months 10 to 18 inclusive), separated by private vs public hospital (numbers ‘stacked’).

Comment in

References

    1. Sacco E, Prayer-Galetti T, Pinto F, et al. Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: incidence by definition, risk factors and temporal trend in a large series with a long-term follow-up. BJU Int. 2006;97:1234–1241. - PubMed
    1. Berryhill R, Jr, Jhaveri J, Yadav R, et al. Robotic prostatectomy: a review of outcomes compared with laparoscopic and open approaches. Urology. 2008;72:15–23. - PubMed
    1. Herschorn S, Bruschini H, Comiter C, Grise P, Hanus T, Kirschner-Hermanns R. Surgical treatment of urinary incontinence in men. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A, editors. 4th International Consultation on Incontinence. Paris: Health Publication Ltd; 2009. pp. 1121–1190.
    1. Smith DP, King MT, Egger S, et al. Quality of life three years after diagnosis of localised prostate cancer: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2009;339:b4817. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bauer RM, Gozzi C, Hubner W, et al. Contemporary management of postprostatectomy incontinence. Eur Urol. 2011;59:985–996. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms