Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Sep 21;2013(1):13.
doi: 10.1186/1687-4153-2013-13.

Bayesian methods for expression-based integration of various types of genomics data

Affiliations

Bayesian methods for expression-based integration of various types of genomics data

Elizabeth M Jennings et al. EURASIP J Bioinform Syst Biol. .

Abstract

: We propose methods to integrate data across several genomic platforms using a hierarchical Bayesian analysis framework that incorporates the biological relationships among the platforms to identify genes whose expression is related to clinical outcomes in cancer. This integrated approach combines information across all platforms, leading to increased statistical power in finding these predictive genes, and further provides mechanistic information about the manner in which the gene affects the outcome. We demonstrate the advantages of the shrinkage estimation used by this approach through a simulation, and finally, we apply our method to a Glioblastoma Multiforme dataset and identify several genes potentially associated with the patients' survival. We find 12 positive prognostic markers associated with nine genes and 13 negative prognostic markers associated with nine genes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Platform relationships. Schematic representation of the multiple molecular platforms and their biological relationships.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Simulation results. Least squares estimates and posterior means from our method are plotted against the true β values. The vertical lines denote the difference between the estimates from each method thus indicating the shrinkage properties of the NG prior.
Figure 3
Figure 3
GBM data results. The posterior probabilities (based on MCMC samples) that βj,i > δ + ∗ is plotted, where βj,i is the clinical model regression coefficient for the marker associated with platform j of gene i, and δ+=log(1+δ) is the transformed upper practical cutoff. For our analysis, we use δ = 0.05, which corresponds to a 5% change in survival time, so the posterior probability shown here indicates the probability that a one unit increase in the marker results in at least a 5% increase in survival time. We consider the marker j,i to be significant if this probability is greater than 0.5.
Figure 4
Figure 4
GBM data results. The posterior probabilities (based on MCMC samples) that βj,i<δ is plotted, where βj,i is the clinical model regression coefficient for the marker associated with platform j of gene i, and δ=log(1δ) is the transformed lower practical cutoff. For our analysis, we use δ = 0.05, which corresponds to a 5% change in survival time, so the posterior probability shown here indicates the probability that a one unit increase in the marker results in at least a 5% decrease in survival time. We consider the marker j,i to be significant if this probability is greater than 0.5.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Regression coefficient posterior means. The estimates of the regression coefficients in the clinical model (βj,i’s) are shown, where βj,i is the coefficient for the marker associated with platform j of gene i; the estimates are computed as the posterior means from our MCMC samples. The multiple platforms for each gene are labeled by color, and solid plot markers indicate that the effect was found to be significant, meaning that the posterior probability that a one unit increase in the marker results in at least a 5% change in survival time is at least 0.5.

References

    1. Kanu OO, Hughes B, Di C, Lin N, Fu J, Bigner DD, Yan H, Adamson C. Glioblastoma multiforme oncogenomics and signaling pathways. Clin. Med. Oncol. 2009;3:39–52. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pathway analysis of genetic alterations in glioblastoma (TCGA) http://cbio.mskcc.org/cancergenomics/gbm/pathways/ 2012. [Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center]. Accessed 9 August 2012.
    1. Program overview. http://cancergenome.nih.gov/abouttcga/overview 2012. [The Cancer Genome Atlas]. Accessed 9 August 2012.
    1. Wang W, Baladandayuthapani V, Morris JS, Broom BM, Manyam G, Do KA. iBAG: integrative Bayesian analysis of high-dimensional multiplatform genomics data. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(2):149–159. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts655. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bell D, Berchuck A, Birrer M, Chien J, Cramer D, Dao F, Dhir R, DiSaia P, Gabra H, Glenn P, Godwin A, Gross J, Hartmann L, Huang M, Huntsman D, Iacocca M, Imielinski M, Kalloger S, Karlan B, Levine D, Mills G, Morrison C, Mutch D, Olvera N, Orsulic S, Park K, Petrelli N, Rabeno B, Rader J, Sikic B. et al.Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature. 2011;474(7353):609–615. doi: 10.1038/nature10166. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources