Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in England: practice and outcomes described in the Hospital Episode Statistics database
- PMID: 24053772
- DOI: 10.1111/bju.12373
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in England: practice and outcomes described in the Hospital Episode Statistics database
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the postoperative outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in English National Health Service (NHS) hospitals.
Patients and methods: We extracted records from the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) database for all patients undergoing PCNL between March 2006 and January 2011 in English NHS hospitals. Outcome measures were haemorrhage, infection within the index admission, and rates of emergency readmission and in-hospital mortality within 30 days of surgery.
Results: A total of 5750 index PCNL procedures were performed in 165 hospitals. During the index admission, haemorrhage was recorded in 81 patients (1.4%), 192 patients (3.8%) had a urinary tract infection (UTI), 95 patients (1.7%) had fever, and 41 patients (0.7%) had sepsis. There were 595 emergency readmissions in 518 patients (9.0%). Reasons for readmission were varied: 70 (1.2%) with UTI, 15 (0.3%) sepsis, 73 (1.3%) haematuria, 25 (0.4%) haemorrhage, and 25 (0.4%) acute urinary retention. There were 13 (0.2%) in-hospital deaths within 30 days of surgery.
Conclusions: Haemorrhage and infection represent relatively common and potentially severe complications of PCNL. Mortality is extremely rare after PCNL (about one in 400 procedures overall) but almost one in 10 patients have an unplanned hospital readmission within 30 days of surgery. Complications of PCNL may be under-reported in the HES database and need to be corroborated using other data sources.
Keywords: database; healthcare quality; percutaneous nephrolithotomy; surgical outcomes.
© 2013 The Authors. BJU International © 2013 BJU International.
Comment in
-
How are we doing with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in England?BJU Int. 2014 May;113(5):689-90. doi: 10.1111/bju.12417. BJU Int. 2014. PMID: 24717061 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Hospital Volume Does Not Influence the Safety of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in England: A Population-Based Cohort Study.J Endourol. 2015 Aug;29(8):899-906. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0007. Epub 2015 May 4. J Endourol. 2015. PMID: 25778687
-
Nationwide Readmission Rates Following Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Does Age Matter?J Endourol. 2019 Sep;33(9):704-711. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0239. Epub 2019 Jul 23. J Endourol. 2019. PMID: 31232120 Free PMC article.
-
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treatment of large stones within horseshoe kidneys.Urology. 2004 Sep;64(3):426-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.04.018. Urology. 2004. PMID: 15351557
-
Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy compared to percutaneous nephrolithotomy as surgical management for large renal pelvic calculi: a meta-analysis.J Urol. 2013 Sep;190(3):888-93. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.092. Epub 2013 Feb 27. J Urol. 2013. PMID: 23454154 Review.
-
Tubeless vs standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis.BJU Int. 2012 Mar;109(6):918-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10463.x. Epub 2011 Aug 24. BJU Int. 2012. PMID: 21883839 Review.
Cited by
-
Analysis of factors affecting re-admission after retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stone.World J Urol. 2019 Jun;37(6):1205-1210. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2507-0. Epub 2018 Oct 3. World J Urol. 2019. PMID: 30283996
-
Safety and efficacy of vacuum-assisted mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of renal stone disease: an analysis of stone free status and postoperative infectious complications.Int Braz J Urol. 2024 Nov-Dec;50(6):737-745. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0308. Int Braz J Urol. 2024. PMID: 39133794 Free PMC article.
-
Residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of intraoperative assessment and postoperative non-contrast computerized tomography.World J Urol. 2017 Aug;35(8):1241-1246. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1990-4. Epub 2016 Dec 24. World J Urol. 2017. PMID: 28013344
-
Which factors affect the hospital re-admission and re-hospitalization after flexible ureterorenoscopy for kidney stone?World J Urol. 2016 Sep;34(9):1291-5. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1750-x. Epub 2015 Dec 22. World J Urol. 2016. PMID: 26694186
-
The stone surgeon in the mirror: how are German-speaking urologists treating large renal stones today?World J Urol. 2018 Mar;36(3):467-473. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2148-8. Epub 2017 Dec 7. World J Urol. 2018. PMID: 29218404
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical