Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Nov;217(5):833-42.e1-3.
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.385. Epub 2013 Sep 18.

Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons

Affiliations

Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons

Karl Y Bilimoria et al. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Accurately estimating surgical risks is critical for shared decision making and informed consent. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services may soon put forth a measure requiring surgeons to provide patients with patient-specific, empirically derived estimates of postoperative complications. Our objectives were to develop a universal surgical risk estimation tool, to compare performance of the universal vs previous procedure-specific surgical risk calculators, and to allow surgeons to empirically adjust the estimates of risk.

Study design: Using standardized clinical data from 393 ACS NSQIP hospitals, a web-based tool was developed to allow surgeons to easily enter 21 preoperative factors (demographics, comorbidities, procedure). Regression models were developed to predict 8 outcomes based on the preoperative risk factors. The universal model was compared with procedure-specific models. To incorporate surgeon input, a subjective surgeon adjustment score, allowing risk estimates to vary within the estimate's confidence interval, was introduced and tested with 80 surgeons using 10 case scenarios.

Results: Based on 1,414,006 patients encompassing 1,557 unique CPT codes, a universal surgical risk calculator model was developed that had excellent performance for mortality (c-statistic = 0.944; Brier score = 0.011 [where scores approaching 0 are better]), morbidity (c-statistic = 0.816, Brier score = 0.069), and 6 additional complications (c-statistics > 0.8). Predictions were similarly robust for the universal calculator vs procedure-specific calculators (eg, colorectal). Surgeons demonstrated considerable agreement on the case scenario scoring (80% to 100% agreement), suggesting reliable score assignment between surgeons.

Conclusions: The ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator is a decision-support tool based on reliable multi-institutional clinical data, which can be used to estimate the risks of most operations. The ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator will allow clinicians and patients to make decisions using empirically derived, patient-specific postoperative risks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Plots of mean observed rates and universal-model-predicted rates for CPT codes. *Only CPTs with at least 200 cases are included. The limit lines on either side of the diagonal representing perfect agreement (observed = predicted) are set at ±25% (from the diagonal). Scatter plots are in the left column, while the right column includes the interquartile range (IQR) around the predicted values for each CPT group. The IQR spread represents differences in patient-predicted risk within each CPT code.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Screenshots of the ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculators (http://riskcalculators.facs.org). (A) Risk factor entry screen. (B) Report screen.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Screenshots of the ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculators (http://riskcalculators.facs.org). (A) Risk factor entry screen. (B) Report screen.

References

    1. Walker JA. What is the effect of preoperative information on patient satisfaction? Br J Nurs. 2007;16:27–32. - PubMed
    1. Leclercq WK, Keulers BJ, Scheltinga MR, et al. A review of surgical informed consent: past, present, and future. A quest to help patients make better decisions. World J Surg. 2010;34:1406–1415. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Knops AM, Legemate DA, Goossens A, et al. Decision aids for patients facing a surgical treatment decision: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2013;257:860–866. - PubMed
    1. Schenker Y, Fernandez A, Sudore R, et al. Interventions to improve patient comprehension in informed consent for medical and surgical procedures: a systematic review. Med Decis Making. 2011;31:151–173. - PMC - PubMed
    1. [May 2, 2013];Measure Application Partnership Pre-Rule Making Report. 2013 http://www.qualityforum.org/Publications/2013/02/MAP_Pre-Rulemaking_Repo....

Publication types