Liver masses: a clinical, radiologic, and pathologic perspective
- PMID: 24055987
- PMCID: PMC3959647
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.09.017
Liver masses: a clinical, radiologic, and pathologic perspective
Abstract
Liver masses present a relatively common clinical dilemma, particularly with the increasing use of various imaging modalities in the diagnosis of abdominal and other symptoms. The accurate and reliable determination of the nature of the liver mass is critical, not only to reassure individuals with benign lesions but also, and perhaps more importantly, to ensure that malignant lesions are diagnosed correctly. This avoids the devastating consequences of missed diagnosis and the delayed treatment of malignancy or the unnecessary treatment of benign lesions. With appropriate interpretation of the clinical history and physical examination, and the judicious use of laboratory and imaging studies, the majority of liver masses can be characterized noninvasively. Accurate characterization of liver masses by cross-sectional imaging is particularly dependent on an understanding of the unique phasic vascular perfusion of the liver and the characteristic behaviors of different lesions during multiphasic contrast imaging. When noninvasive characterization is indeterminate, a liver biopsy may be necessary for definitive diagnosis. Standard histologic examination usually is complemented by immunohistochemical analysis of protein biomarkers. Accurate diagnosis allows the appropriate selection of optimal management, which is frequently reassurance or intermittent follow-up evaluations for benign masses. For malignant lesions or those at risk of malignant transformation, management depends on the tumor staging, the functional status of the uninvolved liver, and technical surgical considerations. Unresectable metastatic masses require oncologic consultation and therapy. The efficient characterization and management of liver masses therefore requires a multidisciplinary collaboration between the gastroenterologist/hepatologist, radiologist, pathologist, hepatobiliary or transplant surgeon, and medical oncologist.
Keywords: Cholangiocarcinoma; Focal Nodular Hyperplasia; Hepatic Adenoma; Hepatic Hemangioma; Hepatocellular Carcinoma; Liver Imaging.
Copyright © 2014 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
References
-
- Roberts LR. Clinical Approach to Liver Mass Lesions. In: Hauser SC, editor. Mayo Clinic Gastroenterology and Hepatology Board Review. 4th ed Oxford University Press: Mayo Clinic Scientific Press; 2011. pp. 281–94.
-
- Marrero JA, El-Serag HB. Alpha-fetoprotein should be included in the hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance guidelines of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2011;53(3):1060–1061. author reply 1061-1062. Epub 2011/03/05. - PubMed
-
- Lee E, Edward S, Singal AG, et al. Improving Screening for Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Incorporating Data on Levels of alpha-Fetoprotein, Over Time. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11(4):437–440. Epub 2012/12/19. - PubMed
-
- Wong LL, Naugler WE, Schwartz J, et al. Impact of locoregional therapy and alpha-fetoprotein on outcomes in transplantation for liver cancer: a UNOS Region 6 pooled analysis. Clin Transplant. 2013;27(1):E72–79. Epub 2013/01/03. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
