The development of the Bronx Community Research Review Board: a pilot feasibility project for a model of community consultation
- PMID: 24056516
- PMCID: PMC4795445
- DOI: 10.1353/cpr.2013.0037
The development of the Bronx Community Research Review Board: a pilot feasibility project for a model of community consultation
Abstract
Background: The Bronx Community Research Review Board (BxCRRB) is a community-academic partnership (CAP) between the Albert Einstein College of Medicine and The Bronx Health Link (BHL). Rather than asking clinical investigators to create their own individual process de novo, we have developed an innovative, structural approach to achieve community consultation in research planning, implementation, and dissemination that involves and educates the public about research.
Objectives: To collaboratively develop (1) an independent research review board of volunteer community residents and repre sentatives that tests a model of community consultation, dialogue, and "community-informed consent" by reviewing community-based research proposals; and (2) to increased understanding of and participation in clinical research in the Bronx.
Methods: (1) Recruiting members from the Health and Human Services committees of community boards, focus groups, and community health events; (2) interviewing and selecting members based on community involvement, experiences, availability, and demographics of the Bronx; (3) training members in bioethics and research methods; and (4) facilitating meetings and discussions between clinical researchers and the BxCRRB for research review and consultation.
Results: There is substantial interest among Bronx residents in participating in the BxCRRB. The BxCRRB provided feedback to researchers to ensure the protection of participants' rights, to improve research design by promoting increased accountability to the community, and expanded its scope to include earlier stages of the research process.
Conclusion: The BxCRRB is a viable model for community consultation in research, but more time for implementation and evolution is needed to improve its review practices and ensure community input at all stages of the research process.
Figures
Comment in
-
Ethical engagement of communities, institutions, and providers in research: lessons from the community.Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2013 Fall;7(3):353-5. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2013.0035. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2013. PMID: 24056517 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb;(81):iii-vi, 1-72. Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002. PMID: 12049028 Free PMC article.
-
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29. J Clin Oncol. 2003. PMID: 12721281
-
Exception from informed consent: viewpoint of institutional review boards--balancing risks to subjects, community consultation, and future directions.Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;12(11):1050-5. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.015. Acad Emerg Med. 2005. PMID: 16264073
-
Improving the Reach of the National Diabetes Prevention Program Within a Health Disparities Population: A Bronx New York Pilot Project Crossing Health- and Community-Based Sectors.J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2016 Fall;36(4):300-306. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000136. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2016. PMID: 28350313
-
Towards an assessment for organizational participatory research health partnerships: A systematic mixed studies review with framework synthesis.Eval Program Plann. 2019 Apr;73:116-128. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.12.003. Epub 2018 Dec 11. Eval Program Plann. 2019. PMID: 30583063
Cited by
-
A Cross Sectional Survey of Recruitment Practices, Supports, and Perceived Roles for Unaffiliated and Non-scientist Members of IRBs.AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2023;14(3):174-184. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2023.2180107. Epub 2023 Feb 23. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2023. PMID: 36821084 Free PMC article.
-
Community-Based Review of Research Across Diverse Community Contexts: Key Characteristics, Critical Issues, and Future Directions.Am J Public Health. 2015 Jul;105(7):1294-301. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302588. Epub 2015 May 14. Am J Public Health. 2015. PMID: 25973834 Free PMC article.
-
Aligning clinical research ethics with community-engaged and participatory research in the United States.Front Public Health. 2023 May 4;11:1122479. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1122479. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37213625 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Research 101: A process for developing local guidelines for ethical research in heavily researched communities.Harm Reduct J. 2019 Jul 1;16(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12954-019-0315-5. Harm Reduct J. 2019. PMID: 31262305 Free PMC article.
-
A scoping review to identify and describe the characteristics of theories, models and frameworks of health research partnerships.Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Jun 18;20(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00877-4. Health Res Policy Syst. 2022. PMID: 35717196 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous