The cost associated with interstitial thermotherapy for tonsil reduction vs. standard tonsillectomy
- PMID: 24057100
- DOI: 10.1007/s00405-013-2705-8
The cost associated with interstitial thermotherapy for tonsil reduction vs. standard tonsillectomy
Abstract
Given the high demand for tonsillectomies in children, the variety of techniques available, and the increasing need to control expenditures, it is important to analyse the costs associated with surgical procedures. The aim in the present study was to compare the cost of interstitial thermotherapy for tonsil volume reduction with conventional tonsillectomy. This was a nonrandomized, retrospective analysis at a public practice regional hospital between 2010 and 2012. Paediatric patients that underwent molecular resonance (MR)-induced tonsil thermal ablation (day case admission) were matched, according to age and concurrent surgery, to patients that underwent tonsillectomy by standard bipolar dissection (ordinary admission) during the same study period. Both groups were compared in economic terms based on operating room (OR) times, salaries, materials and hospitalization cost. Sixty-two patients were included (31 in each group). The mean ages of patients in the MR and tonsillectomy groups were 5.6 (2.7 SD) and 5.1 years (2.0 SD), respectively. A significantly lower mean surgery time (28.25 vs. 36.95 min), anaesthesia time (48.79 vs. 61.73 min), OR time (64.18 vs. 76.16 min), and OR cost (€166.60 vs. €199.58) were found in the MR group (P < 0.05). The mean cost-per-patient was significantly higher in the MR technique when the expenses of the single-use probe and the overnight stay were, respectively, added (€408.60 vs. €374.58, P = 0.007). The present study confirmed increased costs for interstitial thermotherapy for tonsil reduction compared to conventional tonsillectomy. Operation time and early discharge savings were eclipsed by the cost of the disposable probes.
Similar articles
-
Indirect costs related to caregivers' absence from work after paediatric tonsil surgery.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Jun;274(6):2629-2636. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4526-7. Epub 2017 Mar 14. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017. PMID: 28289832 Free PMC article.
-
Radiofrequency tonsil reduction: safety, morbidity, and efficacy.Laryngoscope. 2003 May;113(5):882-7. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200305000-00020. Laryngoscope. 2003. PMID: 12792327
-
Is tonsillectomy mandatory for asymmetric tonsils in children? A review of our diagnostic tonsillectomy practice and the literature.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Jul;110:57-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.04.027. Epub 2018 May 1. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018. PMID: 29859588 Review.
-
Treatment of hypertrophic palatine tonsils using bipolar radiofrequency-induced thermotherapy (RFITT.).Acta Otolaryngol. 2007 Nov;127(11):1176-81. doi: 10.1080/00016480701242428. Acta Otolaryngol. 2007. PMID: 17851941 Clinical Trial.
-
Hemorrhage after tonsillectomy: does the surgical technique really matter?ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2013;75(3):123-32. doi: 10.1159/000342314. Epub 2013 Aug 22. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2013. PMID: 23978795 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical practice guideline: tonsillitis II. Surgical management.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Apr;273(4):989-1009. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-3904-x. Epub 2016 Feb 16. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016. PMID: 26882912
-
Tonsillotomy: facts and fiction.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Apr;272(4):949-969. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3010-x. Epub 2014 Apr 3. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015. PMID: 24695941 Review.
-
[An update on tonsillotomy studies].HNO. 2017 Jan;65(1):30-40. doi: 10.1007/s00106-016-0237-4. HNO. 2017. PMID: 27670422 Review. German.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical