Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec;25(6):664-72.
doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzt062. Epub 2013 Sep 20.

Linking quality of healthcare and health-related quality of life of patients with type 2 diabetes: an evaluative study in Mexican family practice

Affiliations

Linking quality of healthcare and health-related quality of life of patients with type 2 diabetes: an evaluative study in Mexican family practice

Svetlana V Doubova et al. Int J Qual Health Care. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the association between quality of care and health-related quality of life among type 2 diabetes patients.

Design: A cross-sectional study assessing the association between quality of care and quality of life using multiple linear regression analysis.

Setting: Family medicine clinics (FMC) (n = 39) of the Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS) in Mexico City.

Participants: Type 2 diabetes patients (n = 312), older than 19 years.

Main outcome measure(s): Health-related quality of life was measured using the MOS Short-Form-12 (SF-12); quality of healthcare was measured as the percentage of recommended care received under each of four domains: early detection of diabetes complications, non-pharmacological treatment, pharmacological treatment and health outcomes.

Results: The average quality of life score was 41.4 points on the physical component and 47.9 points on the mental component. Assessment of the quality of care revealed deficiencies. The average percentages of recommended care received were 21.9 for health outcomes and 56.6 for early detection of diabetes complications and pharmacological treatment; for every 10 percent additional points on the pharmacological treatment component, quality of life improved by 0.4 points on the physical component (coefficient 0.04, 95% confidence intervals 0.01-0.07).

Conclusions: There was a positive association between the quality of pharmacological care and the physical component of quality of life. The quality of healthcare for type 2 diabetes patients in FMC of the IMSS in Mexico City is not optimal.

Keywords: patient outcomes (health status, quality of life, mortality); quality indicators; quality measurement, quality management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zhang P, Zhang X, Brown J, et al. Global healthcare expenditure on diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010;87:293–301. - PubMed
    1. Carey M, Bacon M, Tu D, et al. The prognostic effects of performance status and quality of life scores on progression-free survival and overall survival in advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;108:100–5. - PubMed
    1. ÓLoughlin C, Murphy NF, Conlon C, et al. Quality of life predicts outcome in a heart failure disease management program. Int J Cardiol. 2010;139:60–7. - PubMed
    1. Glasgow RE, Ruggiero L, Eakin EG, et al. Quality of life and associated characteristics in a large national sample of adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:562–7. - PubMed
    1. Wändell PE. Quality of life of patients with diabetes mellitus. An overview of research in primary health care in the Nordic countries. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2005;23:68–74. - PubMed

Publication types