Why non-invasive brain stimulation should not be used in military and security services

Affiliations

Bernhard Sehm et al. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013.

. 2013 Sep 9:7:553.

doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00553. eCollection 2013.

¹ Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig Leipzig, Germany.

No abstract available

Keywords: TMS; ethics; military; non-invasive brain stimulation; security; tDCS.

References

1. Banissy M. J., Muggleton N. G. (2013). Transcranial direct current stimulation in sports training: potential approaches. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:129 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00129 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
1. Beauchamp T. L., Childress J. F. (1994). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press
1. Bestmann S., Baudewig J., Siebner H. R., Rothwell J. C., Frahm J. (2004). Functional MRI of the immediate impact of transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical and subcortical motor circuits. Eur. J. Neurosci. 19, 1950–1962 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03277.x - DOI - PubMed
1. Brem A. K., Fried P. J., Horvath J. C., Robertson E. M., Pascual-Leone A. (2013). Is neuroenhancement by noninvasive brain stimulation a net zero-sum proposition? Neuroimage. [Epub ahead print]. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.038 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
1. Brukamp K., Gross D. (2012). Neuroenhancement - a controversial topic in contemporary medical ethics, in Contemporary Issues in Bioethics, ed Clark D. P. A. (Rijeka: InTech; ), 39–51