Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Aug 1:14:528.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-528.

Genomic distribution of AFLP markers relative to gene locations for different eukaryotic species

Affiliations

Genomic distribution of AFLP markers relative to gene locations for different eukaryotic species

Armando Caballero et al. BMC Genomics. .

Abstract

Background: Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers are frequently used for a wide range of studies, such as genome-wide mapping, population genetic diversity estimation, hybridization and introgression studies, phylogenetic analyses, and detection of signatures of selection. An important issue to be addressed for some of these fields is the distribution of the markers across the genome, particularly in relation to gene sequences.

Results: Using in-silico restriction fragment analysis of the genomes of nine eukaryotic species we characterise the distribution of AFLP fragments across the genome and, particularly, in relation to gene locations. First, we identify the physical position of markers across the chromosomes of all species. An observed accumulation of fragments around (peri) centromeric regions in some species is produced by repeated sequences, and this accumulation disappears when AFLP bands rather than fragments are considered. Second, we calculate the percentage of AFLP markers positioned within gene sequences. For the typical EcoRI/MseI enzyme pair, this ranges between 28 and 87% and is usually larger than that expected by chance because of the higher GC content of gene sequences relative to intergenic ones. In agreement with this, the use of enzyme pairs with GC-rich restriction sites substantially increases the above percentages. For example, using the enzyme system SacI/HpaII, 86% of AFLP markers are located within gene sequences in A. thaliana, and 100% of markers in Plasmodium falciparun. We further find that for a typical trait controlled by 50 genes of average size, if 1000 AFLPs are used in a study, the number of those within 1 kb distance from any of the genes would be only about 1-2, and only about 50% of the genes would have markers within that distance.

Conclusions: The high coverage of AFLP markers across the genomes and the high proportion of markers within or close to gene sequences make them suitable for genome scans and detecting large islands of differentiation in the genome. However, for specific traits, the percentage of AFLP markers close to genes can be rather small. Therefore, genome scans directed towards the search of markers closely linked to selected loci can be a difficult task in many instances.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of the number of AFLP fragments, number of genes, and average GC content, across the different chromosomes of Arabidopsis thaliana, shown in non-overlapping windows of 200 kb. (A) Number of AFLP fragments (EcoRI/MseI) in red, number of genes in blue. (B) Average GC content. The approximate location of the centromeric regions is marked with an arrow.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of the number of MseI (A) and EcoRI (B) cutting sites across the different chromosomes of Arabidopsis thaliana, shown in non-overlapping windows of 200 kb. The approximate location of the centromeric regions is marked with an arrow.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of the number of AFLP bands (EcoRI/MseI) (in red) and the number of genes (in blue) across the different chromosomes of Arabidopsis thaliana, shown in non-overlapping windows of 200 kb.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Distribution of the observed percentage of genes (red dots) with a given number of AFLP fragments (EcoRI/MseI) within their sequence. The line gives the expectation under a Poisson distribution.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, van de Lee T, Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995;23(21):4407–4414. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bonin A, Ehrich D, Manel S. Statistical analysis of amplified fragment length polymorphism data: a toolbox for molecular ecologists and evolutionists. Mol Ecol. 2007;16(18):3737–3758. - PubMed
    1. Meudt HM, Clarke AC. Almost forgotten or latest practice? AFLP applications, analyses and advances. Trends Plant Sci. 2007;12(3):106–117. - PubMed
    1. Bensch S, Akesson M. Ten years of AFLP in ecology and evolution: why so few animals? Mol Ecol. 2005;14(10):2899–2914. - PubMed
    1. Peters JL, Cnops G, Neyt P, Zethof J, Cornelis K, Van Lijsebettens M, Gerats T. An AFLP-based genome-wide mapping strategy. Theor Appl Genet. 2004;108(2):321–327. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources