Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Nov;66(4):906-16.
doi: 10.1007/s00248-013-0289-x. Epub 2013 Sep 24.

Variable viral and grazer control of prokaryotic growth efficiency in temperate freshwater lakes (French Massif Central)

Affiliations

Variable viral and grazer control of prokaryotic growth efficiency in temperate freshwater lakes (French Massif Central)

A S Pradeep Ram et al. Microb Ecol. 2013 Nov.

Abstract

The effects of viral lysis and heterotrophic nanoflagellate grazing (top down forces) on prokaryotic mortality and their subsequent impact on their metabolism were estimated in the upper euphotic and deeper aphotic depth of 11 freshwater lakes located in the French Massif Central. The standing stocks of viruses (VA) and heterotrophic nanoflagellate (HNF) varied significantly (p < 0.05) with sampled depth. VA was substantially (twofold on an average) and significantly higher (p < 0.03) at the aphotic compared to euphotic depth, whereas the reverse was true (p < 0.02) for HNF. Among the prokaryote subgroup, high nucleic acid content prokaryotes explained for significant variability in the total VA and served as principle host target for viral proliferation. Like standing stocks, flagellate grazing and viral infection rates also followed similar patterns. In the investigated lakes, the mechanism for regulating prokaryotic production varied with sampled depth from grazing control in the euphotic to control due to viral lysis in the aphotic. We also tested the hypothesis of top down control on prokaryotic growth efficiency (PGE, which we used as an index of prokaryotic physiological and energetic status at the community level) at both depths. Overall, among the studied lakes, PGE varied widely (4-51 %) with significantly (p < 0.05) lower values in the aphotic (mean = 18 ± 4 %) than euphotic depth (mean = 32 ± 9 %). Contrasting observations on the top down control of PGE between sampled depths were observed. The presence of grazers was found to stimulate PGE at the euphotic, whereas viruses through their lytic infection had a strong negative impact on PGE at the aphotic depth. Such observed differences in PGE and the mechanism controlling prokaryotic production with depth could eventually have strong implication on carbon and nutrient flux patterns in the studied lakes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Bacteriol. 2002 Apr;184(7):1888-94 - PubMed
    1. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Jun;72(6):4440-5 - PubMed
    1. Microb Ecol. 1996 May;31(3):249-68 - PubMed
    1. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2004 May;28(2):127-81 - PubMed
    1. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Mar;70(3):1506-13 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources