Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec;59(12):1732-41.
doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2013.210328. Epub 2013 Sep 23.

Digital droplet PCR for rapid quantification of donor DNA in the circulation of transplant recipients as a potential universal biomarker of graft injury

Affiliations

Digital droplet PCR for rapid quantification of donor DNA in the circulation of transplant recipients as a potential universal biomarker of graft injury

Julia Beck et al. Clin Chem. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from grafts in the circulation of transplant recipients is a potential biomarker of rejection. Its usefulness was investigated after heart transplantation during the maintenance phase by use of microarrays and massive parallel sequencing of donor and recipient DNA. Disadvantages of these methods are high costs, long turnaround times, and need for donor DNA. Therefore, we sought to develop a rapid and cost-effective method using digital droplet PCR (ddPCR).

Methods: Plasma samples were collected from stable recipients after liver (LTx, n = 10), kidney (KTx, n = 9), and heart (HTx, n = 8) transplantation as well as from 7 additional patients directly after LTx. Known single-nucleotide polymorphisms were selected for high minor allelic frequencies, of which 41 hydrolysis probe assays were established. Plasma cfDNA was preamplified, followed by conventional real-time PCR to define informative (heterologous) SNPs, which were then used for quantification (percentage) of graft-derived cfDNA (GcfDNA) using ddPCR.

Results: Mean recovery was 94% (SD, 13%) with an imprecision of 4%-14% with the use of controls with 2% minor allele. GcfDNA in stable patients was <6.8% (LTx), <2.5% (KTx), and <3.4% (HTx). On the day of LTx, GcfDNA was approximately 90% and by day 10 it was <15% in complication-free LTx recipients. In 2 patients with biopsy-proven rejection, GcfDNA increased to >60%, whereas in 1 patient with cholestasis no increase was found.

Conclusions: A novel, cost-effective, rapid technique was developed to quantify GcfDNA in transplant recipients. This technique embodies a promising, potentially universal biomarker for early detection of rejection, which could enable more effective therapeutic interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types