Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Apr;1(1):48-9.
doi: 10.1177/2048872612441584.

Stent for Life Initiative: where are we standing and where are we going?

Petr Widimsky  1 , Steen Dalby Kristensen
Affiliations

Stent for Life Initiative: where are we standing and where are we going?

Petr Widimsky et al. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2012 Apr.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Meyer J, Merx W, Dorr R, et al. Succesful treatment of acute myocardial infarction shock by combined percutaneous transluminal coronary recanalization and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J 1982; 103: 132–8 - PubMed
    1. Zijlstra F, de Boer MJ, Hoorntje JCA, et al. A comparison of immediate coronary angioplasty with intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 680–4 - PubMed
    1. Grines CL, Browne KF, Marco J, et al. A comparison of immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 673–9 - PubMed
    1. Gibbons RJ, Holmes DR, Reeder GS, et al. Immediate angioplasty compared with the administration of a thrombolytic agent followed by conservative treatment for myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 685–91 - PubMed
    1. Widimsky P, Budesinsky T, Vorac D, et al. ‘PRAGUE’ Study Group Investigators. Long distance transport for primary angioplasty vs. immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. Final results of the randomized national multicentre trial–PRAGUE-2. Eur Heart J 2003; 24: 94–104 - PubMed