The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence
- PMID: 2406472
The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence
Abstract
Publication bias is the tendency on the parts of investigators, reviewers, and editors to submit or accept manuscripts for publication based on the direction or strength of the study findings. Much of what has been learned about publication bias comes from the social sciences, less from the field of medicine. In medicine, three studies have provided direct evidence for this bias. Prevention of publication bias is important both from the scientific perspective (complete dissemination of knowledge) and from the perspective of those who combine results from a number of similar studies (meta-analysis). If treatment decisions are based on the published literature, then the literature must include all available data that is of acceptable quality. Currently, obtaining information regarding all studies undertaken in a given field is difficult, even impossible. Registration of clinical trials, and perhaps other types of studies, is the direction in which the scientific community should move.
Similar articles
-
An increasing problem in publication ethics: Publication bias and editors' role in avoiding it.Med Health Care Philos. 2017 Jun;20(2):171-178. doi: 10.1007/s11019-017-9767-0. Med Health Care Philos. 2017. PMID: 28342053
-
How important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data.AIDS Educ Prev. 1997 Feb;9(1 Suppl):15-21. AIDS Educ Prev. 1997. PMID: 9083596 Review.
-
Publication bias: the problem that won't go away.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993 Dec 31;703:135-46; discussion 146-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26343.x. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993. PMID: 8192291
-
Reducing publication bias through trial registration.Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jun;109(6):1434-7. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000266557.11064.2a. Obstet Gynecol. 2007. PMID: 17540818
-
An editor's considerations in publishing industry-sponsored studies.Urol Oncol. 2015 Mar;33(3):149-54. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.11.023. Epub 2015 Jan 7. Urol Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25575712 Review.
Cited by
-
The changing forms and expectations of peer review.Res Integr Peer Rev. 2018 Sep 20;3:8. doi: 10.1186/s41073-018-0051-5. eCollection 2018. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2018. PMID: 30250752 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Does Helicobacter pylori infection play a role in iron deficiency anemia? A meta-analysis.World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Feb 21;16(7):886-96. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i7.886. World J Gastroenterol. 2010. PMID: 20143469 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Tian Wang Bu Xin Dan for Insomnia: A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety.Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2019 Mar 24;2019:4260801. doi: 10.1155/2019/4260801. eCollection 2019. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2019. PMID: 31019540 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluation of the potential excess of statistically significant findings in published genetic association studies: application to Alzheimer's disease.Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Oct 15;168(8):855-65. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn206. Epub 2008 Sep 8. Am J Epidemiol. 2008. PMID: 18779388 Free PMC article.
-
Publication bias in recent meta-analyses.PLoS One. 2013 Nov 27;8(11):e81823. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081823. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24363797 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources