Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct 15;109(8):2066-71.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.515. Epub 2013 Sep 24.

Montreal prognostic score: estimating survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer using clinical biomarkers

Affiliations

Montreal prognostic score: estimating survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer using clinical biomarkers

B Gagnon et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: For evidence-based medical practice, well-defined risk scoring systems are essential to identify patients with a poor prognosis. The objective of this study was to develop a prognostic score, the Montreal prognostic score (MPS), to improve prognostication of patients with incurable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in everyday practice.

Methods: A training cohort (TC) and a confirmatory cohort (CC) of newly diagnosed patients with NSCLC planning to receive chemotherapy were used to develop the MPS. Stage and clinically available biomarkers were entered into a Cox model and risk weights were estimated. C-statistics were used to test the accuracy.

Results: The TC consisted of 258 patients and the CC consisted of 433 patients. Montreal prognostic score classified patients into three distinct groups with median survivals of 2.5 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.8, 4.2), 8.2 months (95% CI: 7.0, 9.4) and 18.2 months (95% CI: 14.0, 27.5), respectively (log-rank, P<0.001). Overall, the C-statistics were 0.691 (95% CI: 0.685, 0.697) for the TC and 0.665 (95% CI: 0.661, 0.670) for the CC.

Conclusion: The MPS, by classifying patients into three well-defined prognostic groups, provides valuable information, which physicians could use to better inform their patients about treatment options, especially the best timing to involve palliative care teams.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan–Meier curves over 18 months for the CC. MPS groups: 1, 2, 3.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Results of the changes of the C-statistics over time based on Cox's PH model for the MPS based on the TC and CC.

References

    1. Al-Shaiba R, McMillan DC, Angerson WJ, Leen E, McArdle CS, Horgan P. The relationship between hypoalbuminaemia, tumour volume and the systemic inflammatory response in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Br J Cancer. 2004;91 (2:205–207. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arkenau HT, Olmos D, Ang JE, de BJ, Judson I, Kaye S. Clinical outcome and prognostic factors for patients treated within the context of a phase I study: the Royal Marsden Hospital experience. Br J Cancer. 2008;98 (6:1029–1033. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R, Stone C. Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth International Group: Belmont, CA; 1984.
    1. Chow E, Abdolell M, Panzarella T, Harris KE, Bezjak A, Warde P, Tannock I. Predictive model for survival in patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26 (36:5863–5869. - PubMed
    1. Chua W, Charles KA, Baracos VE, Clarke SJ. Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio predicts chemotherapy outcomes in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2011;104 (8:1288–1295. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances