Clinical decision rules to rule out subarachnoid hemorrhage for acute headache
- PMID: 24065011
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.278018
Clinical decision rules to rule out subarachnoid hemorrhage for acute headache
Abstract
Importance: Three clinical decision rules were previously derived to identify patients with headache requiring investigations to rule out subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Objective: To assess the accuracy, reliability, acceptability, and potential refinement (ie, to improve sensitivity or specificity) of these rules in a new cohort of patients with headache.
Design, setting, and patients: Multicenter cohort study conducted at 10 university-affiliated Canadian tertiary care emergency departments from April 2006 to July 2010. Enrolled patients were 2131 adults with a headache peaking within 1 hour and no neurologic deficits. Physicians completed data forms after assessing eligible patients prior to investigations.
Main outcomes and measures: Subarachnoid hemorrhage, defined as (1) subarachnoid blood on computed tomography scan; (2) xanthochromia in cerebrospinal fluid; or (3) red blood cells in the final tube of cerebrospinal fluid, with positive angiography findings.
Results: Of the 2131 enrolled patients, 132 (6.2%) had subarachnoid hemorrhage. The decision rule including any of age 40 years or older, neck pain or stiffness, witnessed loss of consciousness, or onset during exertion had 98.5% (95% CI, 94.6%-99.6%) sensitivity and 27.5% (95% CI, 25.6%-29.5%) specificity for subarachnoid hemorrhage. Adding "thunderclap headache" (ie, instantly peaking pain) and "limited neck flexion on examination" resulted in the Ottawa SAH Rule, with 100% (95% CI, 97.2%-100.0%) sensitivity and 15.3% (95% CI, 13.8%-16.9%) specificity.
Conclusions and relevance: Among patients presenting to the emergency department with acute nontraumatic headache that reached maximal intensity within 1 hour and who had normal neurologic examination findings, the Ottawa SAH Rule was highly sensitive for identifying subarachnoid hemorrhage. These findings apply only to patients with these specific clinical characteristics and require additional evaluation in implementation studies before the rule is applied in routine clinical care.
Comment in
-
High-stakes diagnostic decision rules for serious disorders: the Ottawa subarachnoid hemorrhage rule.JAMA. 2013 Sep 25;310(12):1237-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.278019. JAMA. 2013. PMID: 24065009 No abstract available.
-
Do more rules make us safer? Clinical decision rules, patient safety, and the role of emergency physicians in health care: January 2014 Annals of Emergency Medicine Journal Club.Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Jan;63(1):84-5. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.11.001. Ann Emerg Med. 2014. PMID: 24355369 No abstract available.
-
Subarachnoid hemorrhage diagnosis.JAMA. 2014 Jan 8;311(2):201. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.284318. JAMA. 2014. PMID: 24399564 No abstract available.
-
Subarachnoid hemorrhage diagnosis--reply.JAMA. 2014 Jan 8;311(2):201-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.284327. JAMA. 2014. PMID: 24399565 No abstract available.
-
Annals of Emergency Medicine journal club. Do more rules make us safer? Clinical decision rules, patient safety, and the role of emergency physicians in health care: answers to the January 2014 journal club questions.Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Jun;63(6):774-81. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.01.004. Ann Emerg Med. 2014. PMID: 24841399 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
