Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar;31(1):173-82.
doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9409-2.

The moderating effect of gender on the relation between expectancies and gambling frequency among college students

Affiliations

The moderating effect of gender on the relation between expectancies and gambling frequency among college students

Jenni B Teeters et al. J Gambl Stud. 2015 Mar.

Abstract

Compared to college females, college males are more likely to report frequent gambling. Research on gambling outcome expectancies has shown that expectations about gambling influence gambling behavior and that endorsement of particular expectancies differs by gender. Knowledge regarding the differential predictive utility of specific gambling expectancies based on gender would help to determine how beliefs about gambling may be fundamentally different for men and women. The present study explored whether gender moderates the relation between gambling expectancy and gambling frequency in a college sample. 421 college students completed an online survey that included questions about their demographics, gambling frequency, and gambling expectancies. Hierarchical regression analyses indicated that gender moderated the relations between the expectancies of social consequences, material gain, and gambling frequency. For females, greater endorsement of social consequences predicted less frequent gambling. For both males and females, greater endorsement of material gain predicted more frequent gambling. The current findings can help inform prevention and intervention efforts by identifying gambling expectations that are differentially related to college student gambling behavior choices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aiken LS, West SG. Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1991.
    1. Bandura A. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall; 1977.
    1. Blinn-Pike L, Worthy SL, Jonkman JN. Disordered gambling among college students: a meta-analytic synthesis. Journal of Gambling Studies. 2007;23(2):175–183. - PubMed
    1. Barnes GM, Welte JW, Hoffman JH, Tidwell MCO. Comparisons of gambling and alcohol use among college students and noncollege young people in the United States. Journal of American College Health. 2010;58(5):443–452. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blom G. Statistical estimates and transformed beta variables. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1958.

LinkOut - more resources