Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013;13(20):2551-61.
doi: 10.2174/15680266113136660182.

Challenges and opportunities for cancer vaccines in the current NSCLC clinical scenario

Affiliations
Review

Challenges and opportunities for cancer vaccines in the current NSCLC clinical scenario

Pedro C Rodriguez et al. Curr Top Med Chem. 2013.

Abstract

This review is aimed to focus on NSCLC as an emerging and promising model for active immunotherapy and the challenges for its inclusion in the current clinical scenario. Cancer vaccines for NSCLC have been focused as a therapeutic option based on the identification of a tumor hallmark and the active immunization with the related molecules that triggers cellular and/or humoral responses that consequently destroy or delay the rate of malignant progression. This therapeutic intervention in an established disease state has been aimed to impact into prolonging patient´s survival with ethically accepted quality of life. Understanding of relationship between structure and function in cancer vaccines is essential to interpret their opportunities to impact into prolonging survival and increasing quality of life in cancer patients. It is widely accepted that the failure of the cancer vaccines in the NSCLC scenario is related with its introduction in the advanced disease stages and poor performance status of the patients due to the combination of the tumor induced immunosuppression with the immune senescence. Despite first, second and emerging third line of onco-specific treatments the life expectancy for NSCLC patients diagnosed at advanced stages is surrounding the 12 months of median survival and in facts the today real circumstances are extremely demanding for the success inclusion of cancer vaccines as therapeutic choice in the clinical scenario. The kinetics of the active immunizations encompasses a sequential cascade of clinical endpoints: starting by the activation of the immune system, followed by the antitumor response and finalizing with the consequential impact on patients' overall survival. Today this cascade of clinical endpoints is the backbone for active immunization assessment and moreover the concept of cancer vaccines, applied in the NSCLC setting, is just evolving as a complex therapeutic strategy, in which the opportunities for cancer vaccines start from the selection of the target cancer hallmark, followed by the vaccine formulation and its platforms for immune potentiating, also cover the successful insertion in the standard of care, the chronic administration beyond progression disease, the personalization based on predictors of response and the potential combination with other targeted therapies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. (1)
Fig. (1)
Challenges and opportunities for cancer vaccines inclusion in the current NSCLC clinical scenario. The cascade of clinical endpoints as backbone for active immunization assessment and each one of the three clinical ends points (white letter filled in dark grey), are challenged by the aging of the majority of patients, the advanced disease stage at diagnosis, the immunosuppressive microenvironment improved by the malignancy and by the broad spectrum of NSCLC molecular phenotypes (black letter non filled). The opportunities start from the selection of the target cancer hallmark, followed by the vaccine formulation and its platforms for immune potentiating, also cover the successful insertion in the standard of care, the long-term administration beyond progression disease, the personalization based on predictors of response and the potential combination with other targeted therapies (black letter filled in light grey).

References

    1. Dalgleish A G, Whelan M A. Cancer vaccines as a therapeutic modality: the long trek. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2006;55:1025–1032. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–74. - PubMed
    1. Rabinovich G A, Gabrilovich D, Sotomayor E M. Immunosuppressive strategies that are mediated by tumor cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2007;25:267–296. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coffman R L, Sher A, Seder R A. Vaccine adjuvants: putting innate immunity to work. Immunity. 2010;33:492–503. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Drake C G. Prostate cancer as a model for tumour immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2010;10:580–593. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances