Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun;142(6):1196-204.
doi: 10.1017/S0950268813002379. Epub 2013 Sep 25.

Temporal and farm-management-associated variation in faecal-pat prevalence of Campylobacter fetus in sheep and cattle

Affiliations

Temporal and farm-management-associated variation in faecal-pat prevalence of Campylobacter fetus in sheep and cattle

J S Duncan et al. Epidemiol Infect. 2014 Jun.

Abstract

The faecal-pat prevalence (as estimated by culture) of Campylobacter fetus from cattle and sheep on 19 farms in rural Lancashire was investigated using standard Campylobacter culture techniques and PCR during a 2-year longitudinal study. C. fetus was isolated from 9·48% [95% confidence interval (CI) 8·48-10·48] of cattle faecal pats and 7·29% (95% CI 6·21-9·62) of sheep faecal pats. There was evidence of significant differences in shedding prevalence between geographical regions; cows in geographical zone 3 had an increased risk of shedding C. fetus compared to cows in geographical zones 1 and 2 (OR 6·64, 95% CI 1·67-26·5, P = 0·007), as did cows at pasture (OR 1·66, 95% CI 1·01-2·73, P = 0·046) compared to when housed. Multiple logistic regression modelling demonstrated underlying seasonal periodicity in both species.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Map of Lancashire, UK, showing geographical location of sampling sites.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
The seasonal component to variation in Campylobacter fetus faecal-pat prevalence on Lancashire dairy farms (n = 15). The grey areas represent the upper and lower 95% confidence intervals.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
The seasonal component to variation in Campylobacter fetus faecal-pat prevalence on Lancashire sheep farms (n = 4). The grey areas represent the upper and lower 95% confidence intervals.

References

    1. Silva J, et al. Campylobacter spp. as a foodborne pathogen: a review. Frontiers in Microbiology 2011; 2: 1–12. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adak GK, et al. Disease risks from foods, England and Wales, 1996–2000. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2005; 11: 365–372. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lastovica AJ, Allos BM. Clinical significance of Campylobacter and related species other than Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. In: Nachamkin I, Szymanski CM, Blaser MJ, eds. Campylobacter, 3rd edn. Washington DC: ASM Press, 2008, pp. 123–150.
    1. Wagenaar JA, et al. Comparative study using amplified fragment length polymorphism fingerprinting, PCR genotyping, and phenotyping to differentiate Campylobacter fetus strains isolated from animals. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2001; 39: 2283–2286. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holst E, et al. Bacterial vaginosis: microbiological and clinical findings. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1987; 6: 536–541. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms