Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Sep 12;8(9):e72712.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072712. eCollection 2013.

Factors affecting compliance with clinical practice guidelines for pap smear screening among healthcare providers in africa: systematic review and meta-summary of 2045 individuals

Etienne Asonganyi  1 , Meenakshi Vaghasia, Clarissa Rodrigues, Amruta Phadtare, Anne Ford, Ricardo Pietrobon, Julius Atashili, Catherine Lynch
Affiliations

Factors affecting compliance with clinical practice guidelines for pap smear screening among healthcare providers in africa: systematic review and meta-summary of 2045 individuals

Etienne Asonganyi et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Although the importance of the Pap smear in reducing cancer incidence and mortality is known, many countries in Africa have not initiated yet widespread national cervical cancer screening programs. The World Health Organization (WHO) has published Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) on cervical cancer screening in developing countries; however, there is a gap between expectations and clinical performance. Thus, the aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-summary to identify factors affecting compliance with CPGs for Pap screening among healthcare providers in Africa.

Methods: And Findings: MEDLINE, Scirus, Opengate and EMBASE databases were searched in January 2012. Studies involving medical personnel practicing in Africa, whose outcome measured any factors that affect medical personnel from using a Pap smear to screen for cervical cancer, were included. Two reviewers independently evaluated titles and abstracts, then full-texts, extracted data and assessed quality of the included studies. A descriptive analysis of the included studies was conducted. We calculated Frequency effect sizes (FES) for each finding and Intensity effect sizes (IES) for each article to represent their magnitudes in the analyses. Of 1011 studies retrieved, 11 studies were included (2045 individuals). Six different themes related to the factors affecting compliance with CPGs were identified: Insufficient Knowledge/Lack of awareness (FES = 82%), Negligence/Misbeliefs (FES = 82%), Psychological Reasons (FES = 73%), Time/Cost Constraint (FES = 36%), Insufficient infrastructure/training (FES = 45%) and also no reason given (FES = 36%). IES for articles ranged between 33 and 83%.

Conclusions: These results suggest that prevention initiatives should be comprehensive to include education and resources needs assessments and improvement, Pap smear test training, strategies on costing, and practitioner time studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. PRISMA flowchart.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. GLOBOCAN (2008) website. Available: <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://globocan.iarc.fr/factsheets/populations/factsheet.asp?uno=902#women"><underline>http://globocan.iarc.fr/factsheets/populations/factsheet.asp?uno=902#WOMEN</underline></ext-link>. Accessed 2013 April 27.
    1. Ghim SJ, Basu PS, Jenson A (2002) Cervical Cancer: Etiology, Pathogenesis, Treatment, and Future Vaccines. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 3: 207–214. PubMed: 12718577. - PubMed
    1. Anttila A, Pukkala E, Söderman B, Kallio M, Nieminen P et al. (1999) Effect of organised screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Finland, 1963-1995: recent increase in cervical cancer incidence. Int J Cancer 83: 59-65. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19990924)83:1. PubMed: 10449609. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eddy DM (1990) Screening for cervical cancer. Ann Intern Med 113: 214-226. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-113-3-214. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gakidou E, Nordhagen S, Obermeyer Z (2008) Coverage of cervical cancer screening in 57 countries: low average levels and large inequalities. Plos Med 5(6): doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050132. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types