Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Dec;1(4):523-9.
doi: 10.1007/s13142-011-0076-5.

Weight loss-there is an app for that! But does it adhere to evidence-informed practices?

Affiliations

Weight loss-there is an app for that! But does it adhere to evidence-informed practices?

Emily R Breton et al. Transl Behav Med. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Little is known about how much smartphone apps for weight control adhere to evidence-informed practices. The aim of this study was to review and summarize the content of available weight control apps. Information on content, user rating, and price was extracted from iTunes on September 25, 2009. Apps (n = 204) were coded for adherence to 13 evidence-informed practices for weight control. Latent class analysis was used to identify subgroups of apps based on endorsement practices. Only a small percentage of apps had five or more of the 13 practices (15%). Latent class analysis revealed three main types of apps: diet, physical activity, and weight journals (19%); dietary advice and journals (34%); and weight trackers (46%). User ratings were not associated with apps from these three classes. Many apps have insufficient evidence-informed content. Research is needed that seeks to develop, improve, and evaluate these apps.

Keywords: Apps; Smartphones; Weight loss; mHealth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Latent class profile plot of the probability of having each of the 13 evidence-informed practices across the three latent classes

References

    1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, McDowell MA, Flegal KM. Obesity among adults in the United States—no statistically significant chance since 2003–2004. NCHS Data Brief. 2007;1:1–8. - PubMed
    1. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2008. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2010;303(3):235–241. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.2014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Winett RA, Anderson ES, Whiteley JA, et al. Church-based health behavior programs: Using social cognitive theory to formulate interventions for at-risk populations. Applied and Preventive Psychology. 1999;8(2):129–142. doi: 10.1016/S0962-1849(99)80004-3. - DOI
    1. Latner JD. Self-help in the long-term treatment of obesity. Obesity Reviews. 2001;2(2):82–97. doi: 10.1046/j.1467-789x.2001.00028.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tsai AG, Wadden TA. Systematic review: An evaluation of major commercial weight loss programs in the United States. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2005;142(1):56–66. - PubMed