Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Dec;2(4):392-400.
doi: 10.1007/s13142-012-0159-y.

Exploring dispositional tendencies to seek online information about direct-to-consumer genetic testing

Ryan S Paquin  1 , Adam S Richards, Laura M Koehly, Colleen M McBride
Affiliations

Exploring dispositional tendencies to seek online information about direct-to-consumer genetic testing

Ryan S Paquin et al. Transl Behav Med. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

Varying perspectives exist regarding the implications of genetic susceptibility testing for common disease, with some anticipating adverse effects and others expecting positive outcomes; however, little is known about the characteristics of people who are most likely to be interested in direct-to-consumer genetic testing. To that end, this study examines the association of individual dispositional differences with health risk perceptions and online information seeking related to a free genetic susceptibility test. Healthy adults enrolled in a large health maintenance organization were surveyed by telephone. Eligible participants (N = 1,959) were given access to a secure website that provided risk and benefit information about a genetic susceptibility test and given the option to be tested. Neuroticism was associated with increased perceptions of disease risk but not with logging on. Those scoring high in conscientiousness were more likely to log on. We found no evidence that neuroticism, a dispositional characteristic commonly linked to adverse emotional response, was predictive of online genetic information seeking in this sample of healthy adults.

Keywords: Direct-to-consumer genetic tests; Individual differences; Information seeking; Perceived risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Caulfield T, Ries NM, Ray PN, Shuman C, Wilson B. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: good, bad or benign? Clin Genet. 2010;77:101–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2009.01291.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hogarth S, Javitt G, Melzer D. The current landscape for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: legal, ethical, and policy issues. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2008;9:161–182. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164319. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gollust SE, Hull SC, Wilfond BS. Limitations of direct-to-consumer advertising for clinical genetic testing. JAMA. 2002;288:1762–1767. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.14.1762. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hudson K, Javitt G, Burke W, Byers P. ASHG Social Issues Committee ASHG statement on direct-to-consumer genetic testing in the United States. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81:635–637. doi: 10.1086/521634. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lerman C, Narod S, Shulman K, et al. BRCA1 testing in families with hereditary breast–ovarian cancer: a prospective study of patient decision making and outcomes. JAMA. 1996;275:1885–1892. doi: 10.1001/jama.1996.03530480027036. - DOI - PubMed