Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Sep;9 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):69-82.
doi: 10.1111/mcn.12080.

The economic rationale for investing in stunting reduction

Affiliations
Review

The economic rationale for investing in stunting reduction

John Hoddinott et al. Matern Child Nutr. 2013 Sep.

Abstract

This paper outlines the economic rationale for investments that reduce stunting. We present a framework that illustrates the functional consequences of stunting in the 1000 days after conception throughout the life cycle: from childhood through to old age. We summarize the key empirical literature around each of the links in the life cycle, highlighting gaps in knowledge where they exist. We construct credible estimates of benefit-cost ratios for a plausible set of nutritional interventions to reduce stunting. There are considerable challenges in doing so that we document. We assume an uplift in income of 11% due to the prevention of one fifth of stunting and a 5% discount rate of future benefit streams. Our estimates of the country-specific benefit-cost ratios for investments that reduce stunting in 17 high-burden countries range from 3.6 (DRC) to 48 (Indonesia) with a median value of 18 (Bangladesh). Mindful that these results hinge on a number of assumptions, they compare favourably with other investments for which public funds compete.

Keywords: benefit-cost ratios; benefitstunting; economic productivity; stunting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no financial relationships or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A life‐cycle approach to investments in the First 1000 Days.

References

    1. Alderman H. (2010) The economic cost of a poor start to life. Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease 1, 19–25. - PubMed
    1. Alderman H. (2013) Economic drivers and consequences of stunting In: Recent Advances in Growth Research: Nutritional, Molecular and Endocrine Perspectives (eds Gillman M.W., Gluckman P.D. & Rosenfeld R.G.) Nestle Nutrition Institute Workshops Series 71, pp 127–130. Karger: Basel, Switzerland. - PubMed
    1. Alderman H., Hoddinott J. & Kinsey B. (2006) Long term consequences of early childhood malnutrition. Oxford Economic Papers 58, 450–474.
    1. Barker J.P. & Osmond C. (1986) Infant mortality, childhood nutrition, and ischaemic heart disease in England and Wales. Lancet 1, 1077–1081. - PubMed
    1. Barros K.M., Manhães‐De‐Castro R., Lopes‐De‐Souza S., Matos R.J., Deiró T.C., Cabral‐Filho J.E. et al (2006) A regional model (Northeastern Brazil) of induced mal‐nutrition delays ontogeny of reflexes and locomotor activity in rats. Nutritional Neuroscience 9, 99–104. - PubMed

Publication types