Intramuscular pressure of the multifidus muscle and low-back pain after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of mini-open and conventional approaches
- PMID: 24074511
- DOI: 10.3171/2013.8.SPINE13183
Intramuscular pressure of the multifidus muscle and low-back pain after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of mini-open and conventional approaches
Abstract
Object: This randomized study was designed to elucidate the time course of the perioperative development of intramuscular multifidus muscle pressure after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and to investigate whether the route of pedicle screw insertion affects this pressure and resultant low-back pain. Although several studies have focused on intramuscular pressure associated with posterior lumbar surgery, those studies examined intramuscular pressure generated by the muscle retractors during surgery. No study has investigated the intramuscular pressure after PLIF.
Methods: Forty patients with L4-5 degenerative spondylolisthesis were randomly assigned to undergo either the mini-open PLIF procedure with pedicle screw insertion between the multifidus and longissimus muscles (n = 20) or the conventional PLIF procedure via a midline approach only (n = 20). Intramuscular pressure was measured 5 times (at 30 minutes and at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery) with an intraoperatively installed sensor. Concurrently, the FACES Pain Rating Scale score for low-back pain and the total dose of postoperative analgesics were recorded.
Results: With the patients in the supine position, for both groups the mean pressure values were consistently 40-50 mm Hg, which exceeded the critical capillary pressure of the muscle. With the patients in the lateral decubitus position, the pressure decreased over time (from 14 to 9 mm Hg in the mini-open group and from 20 to 10 mm Hg in the conventional group). Among patients in the mini-open group, the pressure was lower, but the difference was not statistically significant. Postoperative pain and postoperative analgesic dosages were also lower.
Conclusions: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate postoperative intramuscular pressure after PLIF. Although the results did not demonstrate a significant difference in the intramuscular pressure between the 2 types of PLIF, mini-open PLIF was associated with less pain after surgery.
Similar articles
-
Mini-open versus conventional open posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparison of paraspinal muscle damage and slip reduction.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 15;34(18):1923-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a9d28e. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009. PMID: 19652636
-
Prospective Study of Long-term Effect between Multifidus Muscle Bundle and Conventional Open Approach in One-level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.Orthop Surg. 2018 Nov;10(4):296-305. doi: 10.1111/os.12402. Epub 2018 Nov 7. Orthop Surg. 2018. PMID: 30402963 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of serum markers for muscle damage, surgical blood loss, postoperative recovery, and surgical site pain after extreme lateral interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screws or traditional open posterior lumbar interbody fusion.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Oct 16;18(1):415. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1775-y. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017. PMID: 29037186 Free PMC article.
-
Paraspinal muscle changes after single-level posterior lumbar fusion: volumetric analyses and literature review.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Feb 5;21(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-3104-0. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020. PMID: 32024500 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Paraspinal Muscles of Patients with Lumbar Diseases.J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2018 Jul;79(4):323-329. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1639332. Epub 2018 Apr 16. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2018. PMID: 29660747 Review.
Cited by
-
Effects and Safety of Lumbar Fusion Techniques in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Global Spine J. 2022 Apr;12(3):493-502. doi: 10.1177/2192568221997804. Epub 2021 Mar 23. Global Spine J. 2022. PMID: 33752459 Free PMC article.
-
Predictors of Prolonged Length of Stay After Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Multicenter Study.Global Spine J. 2019 Aug;9(5):466-472. doi: 10.1177/2192568218800054. Epub 2018 Sep 13. Global Spine J. 2019. PMID: 31431867 Free PMC article.
-
Management for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a network meta-analysis and systematic review basing on randomized controlled trials.Int J Surg. 2024 May 1;110(5):3050-3059. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001228. Int J Surg. 2024. PMID: 38446872 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of Spinopelvic Sagittal Balance and Persistent Low Back Pain (PLBP) for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis (DS) following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF).Pain Res Manag. 2020 Jan 11;2020:5971937. doi: 10.1155/2020/5971937. eCollection 2020. Pain Res Manag. 2020. PMID: 32399129 Free PMC article.
-
A comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a literature review and meta-analysis.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Nov 5;15:367. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-367. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014. PMID: 25373605 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources