Comparative studies on the genotoxic activity of mainstream smoke condensate from cigarettes which burn or only heat tobacco
- PMID: 2407532
- DOI: 10.1002/em.2850150206
Comparative studies on the genotoxic activity of mainstream smoke condensate from cigarettes which burn or only heat tobacco
Abstract
The in vitro genotoxic activity of mainstream cigarette smoke condensate (CSC) from cigarettes which heat but do not burn tobacco was compared to that of CSC from cigarettes which burn tobacco. CSCs from five cigarettes were compared. Three of the cigarettes [the Kentucky reference research cigarette (1R4F), a commercially available ultra-low tar brand (ULT) and a commercially available ultra-low tar menthol brand (ULT-menthol]) burn tobacco while two of the cigarettes [a regular (TEST) and a menthol (TEST-menthol]) heat tobacco. CSC from all cigarettes were collected by identical standard techniques, which involved collecting mainstream smoke particulate matter on Cambridge filter pads under FTC smoking conditions. The pads were extracted with DMSO, and the CSCs obtained [10 mg total particulate matter (TPM)/ml DMSO] were evaluated at identical concentrations in an in vitro genetic toxicology test battery. CSCs from 1R4F, ULT, and ULT-menthol cigarettes were mutagenic in Ames bacterial strains TA98, TA100, TA1537, and TA1538 in the presence of metabolic activation (S9 from Aroclor-induced rat liver) but negative in strain TA1535. In the absence of metabolic activation, 1R4F, ULT, and ULT-menthol CSCs were not mutagenic except for a weak response in strain TA1537 for the 1R4F and ULT CSCs. TEST and TEST-menthol CSCs were nonmutagenic in all five bacterial strains, both with and without metabolic activation. CSCs from 1R4F, ULT, and ULT-menthol cigarettes were positive in the CHO-chromosomal aberration assay and in the CHO--sister chromatid exchange assay both with and without metabolic activation while TEST and TEST-menthol CSCs were negative in both assays, either with or without metabolic activation. CSCs from 1R4F, ULT, and ULT-menthol cigarettes were weakly positive in inducing DNA repair in cultured rat hepatocytes while TEST and TEST-menthol CSCs were negative in this assay. All five CSCs were nonmutagenic in the CHO-HGPRT assay both with and without metabolic activation. CSCs from the 1R4F, ULT, and ULT-menthol cigarettes were cytotoxic in the CHO-HGPRT assay, both with and without metabolic activation, while TEST and TEST-menthol CSCs were not cytotoxic under either condition. These results demonstrate that mainstream CSCs from the TEST and TEST-menthol cigarettes are neither genotoxic nor cytotoxic under conditions where CSCs from 1R4F, ULT, and ULT-menthol cigarettes are genotoxic and/or cytotoxic in a concentration-dependent manner.
Similar articles
-
Genetic toxicology studies comparing the activity of sidestream smoke from cigarettes which burn or only heat tobacco.Mutat Res. 1990 Feb;240(2):59-72. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(90)90008-p. Mutat Res. 1990. PMID: 2300076
-
Chemical and biological studies of a new cigarette that primarily heats tobacco. Part 2. In vitro toxicology of mainstream smoke condensate.Food Chem Toxicol. 1998 Mar;36(3):183-90. doi: 10.1016/s0278-6915(97)00107-5. Food Chem Toxicol. 1998. PMID: 9609391
-
Comparative genotoxicity testing of mainstream whole smoke from cigarettes which burn or heat tobacco.Mutat Res. 1990 Sep;242(1):37-45. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(90)90097-l. Mutat Res. 1990. PMID: 2202896
-
Low ignition propensity cigarettes: smoke analysis for carcinogens and testing for mutagenic activity of the smoke particulate matter.Food Chem Toxicol. 1994 Oct;32(10):917-22. doi: 10.1016/0278-6915(94)90090-6. Food Chem Toxicol. 1994. PMID: 7959447 Review.
-
Genotoxicity of tobacco smoke and tobacco smoke condensate: a review.Mutat Res. 2004 Nov;567(2-3):447-74. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2004.02.001. Mutat Res. 2004. PMID: 15572290 Review.
Cited by
-
Activated charcoal filter effectively reduces p-benzosemiquinone from the mainstream cigarette smoke and prevents emphysema.J Biosci. 2010 Jun;35(2):217-30. doi: 10.1007/s12038-010-0026-2. J Biosci. 2010. PMID: 20689178
-
Genetic toxicology and toxicogenomic analysis of three cigarette smoke condensates in vitro reveals few differences among full-flavor, blonde, and light products.Environ Mol Mutagen. 2012 May;53(4):281-96. doi: 10.1002/em.21689. Epub 2012 Mar 19. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2012. PMID: 22431010 Free PMC article.
-
Development, qualification, validation and application of the Ames test using a VITROCELL® VC10® smoke exposure system.Toxicol Rep. 2018 Apr 12;5:542-551. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2018.04.003. eCollection 2018. Toxicol Rep. 2018. PMID: 29854624 Free PMC article.
-
GC/HRMS Analysis of E-Liquids Complements In Vivo Modeling Methods and can Help to Predict Toxicity.ACS Omega. 2024 Jun 5;9(24):26641-26650. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c03416. eCollection 2024 Jun 18. ACS Omega. 2024. PMID: 38911720 Free PMC article.
-
A comparative assessment of cigarette smoke aerosols using an in vitro air-liquid interface cytotoxicity test.Inhal Toxicol. 2015;27(12):629-40. doi: 10.3109/08958378.2015.1080773. Epub 2015 Sep 4. Inhal Toxicol. 2015. PMID: 26339773 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources