Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec 10;62(23):2244-53.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.099. Epub 2013 Sep 27.

Building quality indicators to improve care for adults with congenital heart disease

Affiliations

Building quality indicators to improve care for adults with congenital heart disease

Michelle Gurvitz et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. .

Abstract

Objectives: This study sought to develop quality indicators (QIs) for outpatient management of adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients.

Background: There are no published QIs to promote quality measurement and improvement for ACHD patients.

Methods: Working groups of ACHD experts reviewed published data and United States, Canadian, and European guidelines to identify candidate QIs. For each QI, we specified a numerator, denominator, period of assessment, and data source. We submitted the QIs to a 9-member panel of international ACHD experts. The panel rated the QIs for validity and feasibility in 2 rounds on a scale of 1 to 9 using the RAND/University of California-Los Angeles modified-Delphi method, and final QI selection was on the basis of median scores.

Results: A total of 62 QIs were identified regarding appropriateness and timing of clinical management, testing, and test interpretation. Each QI was ascertainable from health records. After the first round of rating, 29 QIs were accepted, none were rejected, and 33 were equivocal; on the second round, 55 QIs were accepted. Final QIs included: 8 for atrial septal defects; 9 for aortic coarctation; 12 for Eisenmenger; 9 for Fontan; 9 for D-transposition of the great arteries; and 8 for tetralogy of Fallot.

Conclusions: This project resulted in development of the first set of QIs for ACHD care based on published data, guidelines, and a modified Delphi process. These QIs provide a quality of care assessment tool for 6 ACHD conditions. This rigorously designed set of QIs should facilitate measuring and improving the quality of care for this growing group of patients.

Keywords: ACHD; ASD; CHD; COA; QI; RCT; TGA; TOF; adult congenital heart disease; atrial septal defect; coarctation of the aorta; congenital heart disease; d-transposition of the great arteries; quality improvement; quality indicator; quality of care; randomized clinical trials; tetralogy of Fallot.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. ACHD Quality of Care Conceptual Model
Conceptual framework based on the Donabedian model of quality of care illustrating the integrated effects of structural, process and outcome aspects of healthcare including moderating patient factors(2)

References

    1. Blumenthal D. Part 1: Quality of care--what is it? N Engl J Med. 1996;335:891–4. - PubMed
    1. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966;44(Suppl):166–206. - PubMed
    1. Spertus JA, Eagle KA, Krumholz HM, Mitchell KR, Normand SL. American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association methodology for the selection and creation of performance measures for quantifying the quality of cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2005;111:1703–12. - PubMed
    1. Connelly MS, Webb GD, Somerville J, et al. Canadian Consensus Conference on Adult Congenital Heart Disease 1996. Can J Cardiol. 1998;14:395–452. - PubMed
    1. Baumgartner H, Bonhoeffer P, De Groot NM, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of grown-up congenital heart disease (new version 2010) European Heart Journal. 2010;31:2915–57. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms