Left atrial appendage occlusion: opportunities and challenges

Abstract

Stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation is a growing clinical dilemma as the incidence of the arrhythmia increases and risk profiles worsen. Strategies in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation have included anticoagulation with a variety of drugs. Knowledge that stroke in this setting typically results from thrombus in the left atrial appendage has led to the development of mechanical approaches, both catheter-based and surgical, to occlude that structure. Such a device, if it were safe and effective, might avoid the need for anticoagulation and prevent stroke in the large number of patients who are currently not treated with anticoagulants. Regulatory approval has been difficult due to trial design challenges, balance of the risk-benefit ratio, specific patient populations studied, selection of treatment in the control group, and specific endpoints and statistical analyses selected. Accumulating data from randomized trials and registries with longer-term follow-up continues to support a role for left atrial appendage exclusion from the central circulation as an alternative to anticoagulation in carefully-selected patient populations.

Keywords: AF; CI; INR; LAA; NOAC; RR; Watchman device; atrial fibrillation; confidence interval; international normalized ratio(s); left atrial appendage; left atrial appendage occlusion; nonvalvular atrial fibrillation; novel oral anticoagulant; rate ratio; stroke prevention.