Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jan;40(1):54-60.
doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2013-100636. Epub 2013 Sep 27.

Practical advice for avoidance of pain associated with insertion of intrauterine contraceptives

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Review

Practical advice for avoidance of pain associated with insertion of intrauterine contraceptives

Luis Bahamondes et al. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2014 Jan.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Few studies in the scientific literature provide clear direction on the prevention or management of pain associated with intrauterine contraceptive (IUC) placement. Those that have been published have studied small numbers of women and fail to provide definitive conclusions. There are also no guidelines available detailing recognised standard approaches to this problem. The consensus recommendations in this review focus primarily on non-pharmacological and often non-evidence-based interventions. This review includes general considerations, practical recommendations for both routine and more difficult cases and guidance on the optimal choice of instruments. General considerations, including pre-insertion counselling, the setting for the procedure, the confidence and technique of the provider and the interplay between the provider and assistant, can influence women's level of anxiety and, in turn, influence their perception of pain and their overall experience. Further studies are required to refine the optimal strategy for managing pain associated with IUC insertion.

Keywords: family planning service provision; intrauterine devices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Recommended instruments for performing intrauterine contraceptive placements. (A) Mini and standard tenacula. (B) Tapered versus parallel cervical dilators. (C) Dental syringe.

Comment in

References

    1. Trussell J. Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception 2011;83:397–404 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Winner B, Peipert JF, Zhao Q, et al. Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1998–2007 - PubMed
    1. Lyus R, Lohr P, Prager S. Use of the Mirena LNG-IUS and Paragard CuT380A intrauterine devices in nulliparous women. Contraception 2010;81:367–371 - PubMed
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Clinical Knowledge Summaries UK Medical Eligibility Criteria for use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. 2011. http://www.cks.nhs.uk/contraception_ius_iud/management/scenario_intraute... [accessed 26 November 2012]
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Clinical Knowledge Summaries UK Medical Eligibility Criteria for use of copper intrauterine devices. 2011. http://www.cks.nhs.uk/contraception_ius_iud/management/scenario_intraute... [accessed 26 November 2012]

Publication types