Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Apr;21(2):179-87.
doi: 10.1007/s10140-013-1163-3.

Ovarian and tubal torsion: imaging findings on US, CT, and MRI

Review

Ovarian and tubal torsion: imaging findings on US, CT, and MRI

Ana P Lourenco et al. Emerg Radiol. 2014 Apr.

Abstract

Accurate diagnosis of adnexal torsion is often challenging, as clinical presentation is nonspecific and the differential for pelvic pain is broad. However, prompt diagnosis and treatment is critical to good clinical outcomes and preservation of the ovary and/or fallopian tube. Ultrasound (US) imaging is most frequently used to assess torsion. However, as computed tomography (CT) utilization in the emergency setting has increased, there are times when CT is the initial imaging test. Additionally, the nonspecific clinical presentation may initially be interpreted as gastrointestinal in etiology, where CT is the preferred exam. For these reasons, it is imperative to know the findings of adnexal torsion on CT as well as US. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is helpful in cases where the diagnosis remains unclear and is particularly helpful in the young or pregnant patient with equivocal sonographic findings, as it provides excellent soft tissue contrast without ionizing radiation. This article will illustrate the findings of surgically confirmed ovarian and fallopian tube torsion on US, CT, and MRI, including those in the pregnant patient. Ovarian enlargement, adnexal mass, twisting of the vascular pedicle, edematous and heterogeneous appearance of the ovary, peripheral ovarian follicles, free fluid, uterine deviation towards the side of torsion, adnexal fat stranding, tubal dilatation, and decreased adnexal enhancement will be reviewed. Familiarity with the range of imaging findings across multiple modalities is key to improving the likelihood of timely diagnosis and therefore improved clinical outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004 Jun;85(3):250-4 - PubMed
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984 Dec;143(6):1331-4 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 Jun;162(2):203-5 - PubMed
    1. J Ultrasound Med. 2004 Dec;23(12):1643-9; quiz 1650-1 - PubMed
    1. Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Oct;88(4 Pt 2):715-7 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources