Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Aug;42(8):E53-9.

The pros and cons of using larger femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty

Affiliations
  • PMID: 24078959
Review

The pros and cons of using larger femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty

Pranav Rathi et al. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2013 Aug.

Abstract

With the introduction of improved bearing surfaces for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has come a reintroduction of larger femoral heads with the promise of reducing the rate of hip instability and increasing hip range of motion (ROM). The size of femoral heads used for THA ranges from 22 to 40 mm, and even larger heads are used for hip resurfacing. With accurately positioned components, larger heads reduce the hip instability rate and theoretically increase hip ROM. However, for any given bearing surface, the volumetric wear rate is higher for larger heads than for smaller heads, which potentially jeopardizes the long-term survival of these reconstructions. In this article, we review the evidence for use of larger femoral heads with respect to stability, ROM, impingement, wear rate, bearing surfaces, and future directions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources