Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Mar;26(1):227-237.
doi: 10.1037/a0034585. Epub 2013 Sep 30.

Callous-unemotional traits in incarcerated adolescents

Eva R Kimonis  1 , Kostas Fanti  2 , Asha Goldweber  3 , Monica A Marsee  4 , Paul J Frick  4 , Elizabeth Cauffman  5
Affiliations

Callous-unemotional traits in incarcerated adolescents

Eva R Kimonis et al. Psychol Assess. 2014 Mar.

Abstract

The presence of callous-unemotional (CU) traits designates a subgroup of antisocial youth at risk for severe, aggressive, and stable conduct problems. As a result, these traits should be considered as part of the criteria for conduct disorder. The present study tests 2 possible symptom sets (4- and 9-item criteria sets) of CU traits that could be used in diagnostic classification, assessed using self-report with a sample of 643 incarcerated adolescent (M age = 16.50, SD = 1.63 years) boys (n = 493) and girls (n = 150). Item response theory analysis was employed to examine the unique characteristics of each criterion comprising the 2 sets to determine their clinical utility. Results indicated that most items comprising the measure of CU traits demonstrated adequate psychometric properties. Whereas the 9-item criteria set provided more information and was internally consistent, the briefer 4-item set was equally effective at identifying youth at-risk for poor outcomes associated with the broader CU construct. Supporting the clinical utility of the criteria sets, incarcerated boys and girls who endorsed high levels of CU symptoms across criteria sets were particularly at-risk for proactive aggression and violent delinquency.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figures 1
Figures 1
(a) Item characteristic curves and (b) Item information curves for the four item criteria set.
Figures 2
Figures 2
(a) Item characteristic curves and (b) Item information curves for the nine item criteria set.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Byrd AL, Loeber R, & Pardini DA (2012). Understanding desisting and persisting forms of delinquency: The unique contributions of disruptive behavior disorders and interpersonal callousness. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 53, 371–380. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02504.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Caldwell M, Skeem J, Salekin R, & Van Rybroek G (2006). Treatment response of adolescent offenders with psychopathy features: A 2-year follow-up. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 571–596.
    1. Elliott DS, & Ageton S (1980). Reconciling ethnicity and class differences in self-reported and official estimates of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 45, 95–110.
    1. Embretson SE, & Reise S (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Publishers.
    1. Essau CA, Sasagawa S, & Frick PJ (2006). Callous-unemotional traits in community sample of adolescents. Assessment, 13, 454–469. - PubMed

Publication types