Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014;23(1):70-3.
doi: 10.1159/000351887. Epub 2013 Sep 27.

Long-term results of anterior versus posterior operations for herniated cervical discs: analysis of 6,000 patients

George J Dohrmann  1 , Joseph C Hsieh
Affiliations

Long-term results of anterior versus posterior operations for herniated cervical discs: analysis of 6,000 patients

George J Dohrmann et al. Med Princ Pract. 2014.

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the long-term outcomes of anterior versus posterior approaches for cervical disc herniation.

Methods: The records of 6,000 patients who had operations for cervical disc herniation (radiating arm pain and/or motor symptoms involving the upper extremity) and who had been followed for at least 2 years (mean: 7.1 years) were culled from the world literature and included in this analysis. The outcome (good/excellent, according to the patient) of anterior versus posterior surgery was compared.

Results: Of the 6,000 patients, 2,888 (48.1%) had anterior operations (anterior cervical discectomies, with or without fusion) and 3,112 (51.9%) patients were operated on posteriorly (laminoforaminotomies/'keyhole' facetectomies). Although initially equal, in long-term follow-up, patients who had anterior operations had 80% good/excellent results, whereas patients with the posterior approach had 94% good/excellent results. The difference was significant (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The better long-term results with the posterior operation might be due to the more complete opening of the foramen for neural decompression at the time of the operation and thereafter.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Caglar YS, Bozkurt M, Kahilogullari G et al Keyhole approach for posterior cervical discectomy: experience on 84 patients. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2007;50:7–11. - PubMed
    1. Clarke MJ, Ecker RD, Krauss WE, et al. Same segment and adjacent-segment disease following posterior cervical foraminotomy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;6:5–9. - PubMed
    1. Cloward RB. The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. J Neurosurg. 1958;15:602–617. - PubMed
    1. Dan NG. Anterior cervical graftless fusion for soft disc protrusion. A review of 509 disc excisions in 476 patients. J Clin Neurosci. 1998;5:172–177. - PubMed
    1. Dowd GC, Wirth FP. Anterior cervical discectomy: is fusion necessary? J Neurosurg. 1999;90(suppl 1):8–12. - PubMed